1. Mod of [email protected] posts a great Greta Thunberg quote, but then tries to use it to justify not voting in the upcoming US election
  2. Multiple people point out that’s very clearly not what she meant
  3. Removed by mod Removed by mod Removed by mod Removed by mod

Using your mod powers to decide who is allowed and not allowed to speak is not very anarchist of you, @[email protected]

  • lemonmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    I haven’t seen evidence of a strong majority being fine with the decision.

    Among slrpnk commenters on this post I believe the split was 3-3, or possibly 3-2-1.

    Taking into account the comments from dbzer0 folks, it goes to 5-5 or 5-4-1.

    Self-proclaimed anarchists from other instances represent, by my accounting, 1 more “for” and 4 more “against.”

    The other comments from users who may or may not identify as anarchists appear to slant towards against by about the same margin.

    It could be that one or both of us carries a bias in how we perceive support that aligns with what we already believe. I tried to be cognizant of that when I scrolled through to count, but I’m fallible. If I’ve misrepresented, it wasn’t on purpose. That said, I think at best there’s a somewhat even split. I don’t think you can claim that as “most folks” being fine with the actions taken.

    Additionally, the way the mod conducted themselves in these comments doesn’t inspire much confidence that they moderated in good faith