• Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    275
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Plain and simple… She was a woman, and a black person - There will be months of tap dancing and “deep” analysis, but we’re just an ugly, atrophied, broken, racist and patriarchal nation, like deep down in our DNA. We were able to elect Obama, yes - he is half white, and a man (those weren’t the loud messages as they attacked him, but Pennsylvania gramma knew those things quietly when she pulled the lever for him). It’s not satisfying, but it’s just the plain truth here. We’re closer to getting over race than we are over sex.

    Plenty of deliberate work has been done, mostly by republicans, to keep America stupid, poor and in untreated pain, yes… But we’re also just trash on the whole. We raise trash and we vote for trash. We just aren’t smarter than social algorithms, TV soap opera narratives, costumes and makeup. “The pretend business man is white, old, wears a tie and has a gold watch. He feels like how daddy felt when I was little, and when things are bad, daddy fixed them the way I remember it.”

    Video game trolls, people who failed the cop application physical and triple DUI wine moms are America. No further explanation or analysis needed.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I remember hearing many democrats that joked how they voted for the white side of Obama. It wasn’t funny and isn’t funny now. They are not only voting against a woman but one of color.

      We are going let christian fascism take control of America because a large portion of our population is sexiest, and racist. Not to mention all those protest votes or fucker who sat on their couch rather than do the right thing.

      Now we are all fucked.

    • LappingDog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I voted for Harris walz, but I think a lot of this is the fault of Biden for trying to run for reelection and sticking it out until July. I live in the south and I think the lack of a primary reallly hurt the ticket because a sizable portion of the people I’ve talked to felt like she was appointed instead of being elected, which is a bad move when public trust in our institutions is already at an all time low.

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        73
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is all excuses. The fact that Trump made it all the way as the primary candidate for the GOP means that Republicans were okay with what he said and what he did.

        For a normal person, it shouldn’t even take a second to choose Harris. But this isn’t the case. Trump won the popular vote and the presidency despite all the crazy shit because a sizeable part of the citizens voted him in regardless of the reason.

        And not only that, but Republicans won the senate and well on their way to win the house.

        It is about to get real bad, and Americans have themselves to blame for that.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Institutional democrats who thought they knew what they were doing and could ignore the base of the party is to blame. Biden being top of the list. Stubborn self assured who when finally pushed to change was only willing to do it on his terms. And made a decision for everyone, again.

        One of the big stories is a Democratic party Mayor of a super Blue city being corrupt and organizing police to defend him and yet not a single member of the party has spoken out against it. Endorsed by Hakeem Jeffries.

        Status quo is far more important than listening to their base right now and hopefully it changes instead of them once again thinking they need to head further right.

        And for the love all things holy I hope the Democrats learn to stop “gaming” the election with specific counties in “blue walls” because they did advanced math that told them it was all they needed. Bare minimum should never have been the goal.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        The people you talked to are bigoted cowards that wouldn’t have been swayed by any of that shit - She has a vagina and she’s black - That’s all it was ever going to be.

        You’re hearing the thing they hope their neighbor would think of them after the fact, " I was this close, Bill… I just wanted more policy detail… More time… If only they didn’t make me vote for trump".

        Your neighbor fucking sucks, Bill - this is the time you pause, take a breath, and fully internalize that to inform your future interactions.

        • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Shit dude, I’m far left, believed that the only way to protect democracy was to vote for Harris, and then did it, but even I felt like she was appointed. Nobody wanted her as a first choice but we were forced to accept her when she succeeded Biden. She got 14 million less votes than Biden did in 2020. That isn’t only because she’s a black woman. It certainly plays a part, but we can’t act like it wasn’t just general voter malaise that led to this outcome.

          • Snapz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s not “just” the fact that she has a vagina, its that that was always going to be the deciding factor. There’s nuance in understanding the distinction there.

            • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              So your argument is that she got 14 million less votes than Joe specifically because she’s a woman? Because I struggle to see how it could be the “deciding factor” otherwise.

              • Bacano@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                2 months ago

                I agree, it’s an oversimplification. The Democratic party has become the party of ‘going back to business as usual’ and refuses to lower it’s commitment to the corporations that fund it. Trump won 2016 because he was a genuine establishment shaker.

                Leftists need a rouge candidate who refuses to bow. Someone who shows promise of CHANGE and not business as usual.

                • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Leftists need a rouge candidate who refuses to bow. Someone who shows promise of CHANGE and not business as usual.

                  Democrats have proven that they will sue to strip such a person from the ballot. How can they claim to defend democracy while hiding behind First-past-the-post voting?

              • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                yângâ tî sängö
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yes. That is their argument. Because most men of alll races, and even most white women favored him. He got less votes than 2020, and won the popular, got a trifecta.

          • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            None of it should factor. At all.

            The distinction between the candidates was clear enough:

            1. I will lower your taxes (for billionaires), I don’t like immigrants, and I will say all the stuff you think and the lefties made it bad to say. Also if I don’t win I’m going to jail because, for enough money I will do whatever you want (for Russia, Elon, or anyone else).

            2. I am an actual qualified candidate.

            There was no choice. It was taxes and fear and tribalism with a special sprinkle of election interference attempts around the horn.

            She was appointed? So what? Elect her because she’s a better choice, then fix that problem.

            • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              She was appointed? So what? Elect her because she’s a better choice, then fix that problem.

              I think the issue (well one of many) with this line of thinking is that as she was appointed, even if elected she would not have been fairly elected. An issue with the Dems for many years now. People vote against things more then for them and the USA voted for trump over Harris. That nothing seems to have been learned other then “she should have won” or “maybe if we go farther right it will work this time” is a real mindfuck.

              The Dems could “fix” that problem (since it is a party problem) but they don’t, ever. This is as much a failing of the Democratic party as the failure of American democracy collapsing into a two party system.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Plain and simple… She was a woman, and a black person

      She was doing better than the old white guy she replaced though

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        What does “doing better” mean to you in this day and age in that context? Polls are no longer a viable tool. They are captured, manipulated and heavily biased. They ask misleading questions and ask them of non-representative populations.

        Very big difference between “doing better” in “the race” and casting your vote on election day. Again, gramma in Pennsylvania didn’t think Kamala was doing better, or really she didn’t care what she was doing, because there was just one “key issue” that gramma would never get onboard with for Kamala… Gramma didn’t talk about that issue during “the race”, but she was thinking about it when she pulled the lever.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        She was doing better than the old white guy she replaced though

        Was she really though? She couldnt identify a single thing she’d do differently than Biden, who has a truly remarkable and historic level of low approval.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          She had excitement and energy, then said she’d do nothing different than Biden. Lost a lot of energy. Got Time Waltz, more energy, and then the party told him “stop calling Vance weird” and we lost more energy.

          She had a better shot at talking trump, she just loved to shoot herself in the foot.

    • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 months ago

      Obama was a unique situation in that he was both an incredibly charismatic JFK-style figure and ran after the Republicans had managed to both start a very unpopular war and destroy the world economy.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 months ago

        “Imagined” is perhaps the right word considering he wanted to raise taxes for low income people, and lower taxes for rich people.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh yeah. But it’s people’s perceptions that everyone is hunting for anyways. It’s fake love for the working class in the way the rich love their butler but will replace him if he ever gets sick.

          But that perception and the story of the party is super important and how to win elections. The Democrats haven’t been chasing that identity and let it slip while trying to figure out who should be the candidate that cost the least amount of money for its donors.

          It’s not impossible to see how the perceptions got to where they are.

          • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Oh yeah. But it’s people’s perceptions that everyone is hunting for anyways. It’s fake love for the working class in the way the rich love their butler but will replace him if he ever gets sick.

            But that perception and the story of the party is super important and how to win elections. The Democrats haven’t been chasing that identity and let it slip while trying to figure out who should be the candidate that cost the least amount of money for its donors.

            Why does the love of the working class have to be fake?!?!?!?

            Holy fucking hell, democrats have lost their mind.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Setting aside whether she would’ve won had she been a white man, she could’ve made up for that handicap by appealing to the right people if she had actually been trying to win. Pinning it completely on her race and sex simply ignores her absolute failure of a campaign.

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      I get more the sense that people don’t care about her so much - or him either for that matter - so much as how things in general just “feel wrong”. I’m no expert but the news media having been bought out seems a likely culprit. Jon Stewart tried to warn us but we would not listen. He did his part, but if people don’t value things, they tend to fall - or in this case be taken - apart.

    • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      While this is a large part of it, a significant thing I think is that you get a lot more enthusiasm voting for something than against something. If she was campaigning for things I didn’t hear it above the constant “orange shit is an orange shit”.

      A number of terrorist bomb threats to predominantly democratic polling locations in swing states and other fuckery may have also played a role.

          • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Cool, were im the minority, and if libs and progressives cant learn to swallow down each others candidates, the american left in general is cooked

            • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              False choice dilemma.

              Democrats need to swallow their pride and arrogance and admit to themselves that they shouldn’t be going solo against the republicans.

              Do away with First Past The Post voting in blue states and let more players onto the field. This fight is bigger then the democratic party.

              • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Well start figuring out how to get it as a ballot measure in your state now then do what’s left of our democracy a favor, swallow your pettiness and vote for the lesser evil until you get RCV in your area.

                Greens and other parties are only doing favors for the facists as things stand right now.

    • quink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Should have stuck with the British Monarchy, powerless as it comes. A woman as head of state for 70 years and even better, no elections for any president during any of time.

    • 4grams@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Bingo. The party of stupid, obstinant assholes was elected by the stupid, obstinant asshole electorate.

    • wlodi@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Totally agree. After all the progress the US is still not ready to accept anyone else than white men at the top.

      • PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        You people are about to overdose on copium. This is a lazy view. “she lost because of race and sex”. You need to really ask people why she couldn’t secure their vote.

        • NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 months ago

          The “Run Up” podcast had an episode following the Working Families Party while they were out knocking on doors for Harris in a poor projects type neighborhood. The first lady they talk to is hesitant to vote for Harris because she’s a prosecutor who jailed black men for weed. While they are talking and the canvasser is trying to convince her, her neighbor jumps in and he says something to the effect of “Harris is a woman and world leaders won’t respect her and get us in a lot of trouble”.

          Is sexism/racism the reason Harris lost? No, I personally at this point think it has more to do with the Democratic party’s inability to offer solutions for working families - Dems are the center right party representing corporate interests and the elite while paying lip service to actual regular people, MAGA is viewed as the party of the common man, as bullshit as that is it’s what voters feel. I personally think the only way forward is an actual progressive platform which addresses fundamental economic unfairness in the system, and candidates who can connect to and explain that platform to regular folk of all races and demographics.

          But you can’t deny that sexism/racism didn’t play a significant role in the loss.

          • PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Hearing a sexist comment once is not evidence of wide spread sexism. You’re allowing your personal views to color your objective view. Show me dozens of videos of someone saying they won’t vote for Harris because of her sex or race and I might think otherwise. Isolated incidents don’t mean much.

        • Snapz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I used to respond to people like you carefully and in some depth, with the hope that others who needed the words could read mine and feel indirectly supported.

          I’m not doing that today. My original statement stands, your statement is the way you are personally trying to accept the guilt, shame or disappointment in this reality, I’ll leave it at that.

          • PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            “my view is right because it’s mine. Yours is wrong because it’s not mine”

            No guilt, disappointment, or shame in my game. My life is pretty great.

            • Snapz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Actually says a lot about you if you can say that in this moment. Thanks for that clarity.

              • PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yes, it says I’m a normal person living a normal life and I don’t live my life perpetually online and have not become a radical. Cheers mate.

    • Crampon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Dems had the house for 12 years the past 16. Nothing really changed.

      People have claimed Harris wasn’t capable of leading. They got their undeserved confirmation when she turned out to be a no show for 14 hours yesterday.

      You construct a Strawman. If the Dems pulled a capable and charismatic woman out of the top hat she would be able to win.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        “People have been saying…” - oh fuck you, dude.

        First sentence is just beyond stupid. Ignores so many nuanced changes, recovery of the economy from COVID not the least of it and just oblivious to the overall balance of power along the way with an unreasonable, obstructionist gop opposing progress at every turn, even to spite themselves on things like the border bill and the infrastructure bill more recently.

        “Enough” is never done, but that’s a problem with overall politics, mixed with subjective perception. But your ignorant oversimplification here just has no place in a conversation among adults. Maybe go play with the dirt outside or go point at the pictures in that puffy book you love about firetrucks while you shit yourself?

        Your statement is just hollow. It’s defiantly ignorant, smug, selfish, cowardly and just overall, you seem to (without further qualification) fucking suck. To have failed you this poorly, can also confidently assume that your family is just generations of disappointment in front of and behind you. You’re useless lumps, impotently screaming at the sun… At least that’s what “People have been saying…”

        • Crampon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Why did you put in quotation marks to your sentence?

          You’re just salty you got red pilled.

      • OpenPassageways
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        People handed the election on a silver platter to a guy who refused to concede in 2020, and shills are on here saying that Harris is incapable of leading because she took a while to concede?

        And I bet those same people complain that Gore conceeded too soon in 2000.

        What’s this about the Dems having control of the house? Another person that needs a civics lesson? It’s like the cultists saying that “Kamala had 4 years to fix these problems” because they don’t know how our government works.

        The Dems have had control of the government for exactly 2 years since 1980. I don’t understand how anyone can blame the Dems for the state our country is in.

        The silver lining in all this is that now that Republicans have complete control, it will be impossible for shills and cultists to blame the Dems.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    168
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Wisconsin, US here. My county went 70% for Trump this time. That’s versus ~48% in 2016. The problem isn’t democracy. The problem is the people. Pissed as hell for all the wrong reasons at all the wrong people. Unable to see reality, expecting that the person in charge could make it a utopia with the flick of a switch. The average American is delusional and irreparably stupid.

    We constantly joke that it’s Idiocracy, but the truth is…

    • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Thank you for saying it. The voter is the fucking problem. Anyone with half a brain realizes this. Gaza, egg prices, and the candidate not having a dick was enough to the traitor rapist felon to get a trifecta. That’s not a campaign problem. Maybe Harris didn’t run a perfect campaign, but that’s clearly not the issue here

      • Altofaltception@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not American. Maybe my opinion also comes from a place of not understanding how government works in the US. But in 2020, Biden won the Presidency and the Democrats had control of the House and the Senate. Yet, they had a harder time of reversing Trump’s policies than he had pushing them through. Let alone not even trying to enact progressive policies.

        As an outside observer, maybe that’s why people have lost faith in the Democratic party.

        • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 months ago

          Because you have to consider all the court appointments he made, including the supreme court that he stacked. If the Biden admin did any more, itd just get struck down. The court can basically nullify any law or executive order they want without repercussion. Im frankly shocked he got away with as much as he did

          • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Orange asshole is definitely going to get more of those court appointments over the next 4 years. And they will all pretty much be there for the rest of our lives. Any sort of sense of democracy that the US had was probably dealt a death blow today.

            • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              He could, but traditionally the court is suppoaed to have seven Justices. He respects that did not want to be seen as trying to stack it. Unfortunately Republicans have no intention of giving the slightest fuck, were already stacking the court, and will likely continue doing so. If you ask me, I think Biden shouldve stacked it

    • quickdrinkthis@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      This. Was crazy to see everyone turn on the DNC and Harris the moment it was over like we are just unable to come to terms with the fact that we’re surrounded by garbage and morons and there’s no way around it

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The results aren’t showing that though. They are showing a large amount of Democrat voters just stayed on the couch. Trump didn’t get more votes than 2020, all that was needed was an energized democratic base.

          • NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            2 months ago

            Maybe dont genocide next time. Genociders, their financiers, and those who enable them are garbage.

            • quickdrinkthis@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Okay so best case scenario now you have an incompetent, ineffectual rapist and felon now who doesn’t care about genocide in this country let alone another, and will let it drag on. Worst case you have an incompetent rapist and felon who will write a blank check to Netanyahu to finish the genocide quickly with whatever means necessary. His supporters and the people who sat back will share culpability in whichever happens. So we definitely agree on your last sentence

              • NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                2 months ago

                will write a blank check to Netanyahu to finish the genocide quickly with whatever means necessary.

                This is literally happening as we speak now that the election is over. How many Gazans will be left for Trump to genocide? How many months early will Israel complete their ethnic cleansing due to Trump? Is there a rate that can occur faster than the billions of dollars we are currently surprising?

                I voted for your stupid fucking genocide candidate so fuck off.

                • quickdrinkthis@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I mean I’m guessing tens of thousands? Probably several months early when aid to Gaza goes to zero? So yes, I think yes there is a faster rate. Thanks for doing your part though, sincerely. I’m actually a Canadian living in the US so I’m indeed making plans to fuck off.

        • Reygle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Couch-bound voting was easily possible and effortless. They CHOSE to sit it out.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 months ago

          Trump still got 72 million votes and counting this time. That’s with another four years of Trump scandals, revelations, criminal charges, insurrections, mental declines, and on-video insane statements.

          The people who stayed home, or the politicians who failed to motivate them, sure they carry some blame. They could have helped. But they are not the base. The ones who followed Trump from being the outsider who is fun because he’s an asshole/racist like them, to the corrupt traitorous dictator-to-be who they’d like to watch hurt people. Blame them much more.

          The steady level of Trump support unfortunately supports the fear that our culture is just garbage. We’re surrounded by it. There are plenty of proud assholes, sure. But so many people will legitimately be pleasant to everybody they meet and seem to function in society, but either believe horrible things or have a thick shell of indoctrination and ignorance around their brain.

          • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            The people that supported trump were always going to support him and be energized to vote. That’s a big part of why focusing on his lies was such a waste of time, it wasn’t going to change any minds. Winning elections is about motivating your base, undecided voters are a wash and opposing voters aren’t likely to massively shift.

        • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          Do you think they stayed on the couch cause kamala didn’t give them the metaphorical coffee they needed or did they stay on the couch because they knew even if they voted for her and she won she wouldn’t fix the issues this country faces? The corporate donors will not let any two party pawns address their control or runaway wealth. Voting isn’t going to solve our issues now with trump. America is stuck waiting for things to get bad enough that people rise up or doomed to collapse.

    • assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah uh, I really really hate to say it, but… democracy worked this time. The voice of the people is “Trump please”. Democracy just means you get what most people want, not what the best option is.

      • Mesophar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m pretty sure the majority of people mourning the loss of democracy aren’t saying it because they feel the democratic process was broken this election, rather they say it because Dump vowed to dismantle democracy and serve as a dictator.

        • assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Eh… I’m sure that’s the case for some people, but a lot of left and right wing people seem to think democracy=my ideas winning. Those people seem to think Trump winning is not reflective of the (very shitty) will of the people.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s funny that you can now actually do a Pro/Con list about the Idiocracy universe over our own:

      Pros:

      • Lots of diversity
      • Black president
      • President listens to advisors
      • Sex work legal
      • Not crippled by religiosity
      • Puts smart people in positions of power and trust

      Cons:

      • Everyone’s stupid
      • No real due process
      • Public executions
      • Misogyny, homophobia, and ableism are rampant

      Same:

      • Police are knuckle-dragging morons who will murder you
      • President has too much power
      • Costco
  • Wolfram@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I can’t tell you how much faith I’ve lost in the average person in America, especially compared to how… ok, I guess, the last election went and how tight, or possibly over this one is.

    I can’t fathom how fucking stupid anyone would have to be to elect this orange piece of shit that has been upping the dangerous rhetoric constantly. America is broken and it isn’t worth fixing, especially not for the morons that somehow get him elected again. I just hope that I can get to a point in my career that I can move elsewhere, maybe Ireland or New Zealand or something, fuck.

    • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      For real. The rest of the world needs to get their shit together and cripple the US. Cease all trades immediately, end all alliances with the US. The US has the largest military in the world, and now the facists have the reins entirely. They have the oval office, the have the house, they have the Senate and they have the supreme court. The entire world is going to suffer because of this election.

      • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        US politics have gone to dangerous direction for decades. Orange freak is only a symptom. US is gonna become Russia level cleptocracy and when climate crysis hits fully, world will be more separated and chaotic than ever.

        • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, this recent election shows how far gone my country really is. But unfortunately it’s also the golden opportunity facists have been working towards for a long time.

      • bobalot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        There may not be any need for that.

        The United States, China, etc. all have trade policies that are fundamentally unsustainable and result in persistent trade imbalances.

        This causes all sorts of poor economic outcomes for large sectors of those countries. For example, an anaemic household sector in China and over investments in housing, huge private and public sector deficits in the United States, etc.

        In the free market world of Adam Smith and comparative advantage, persistent trade imbalances should not exist.

        Over the medium to long term, imports are meant to pay for exports.

        If there are persistent trade imbalances, it means there is persistent under consumption (China) or over consumption (United States).

        Note: This is not just limited to these countries.

        At some point, there is going to be an economic crisis because it can’t continue forever.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        God you blue conservatives are ridiculous.

        You’d rather support the death of America over doing away with the two party system.

        • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 months ago

          Bud id fucking love to get rid of the two party system. Personally I’ve been talking about it for fucking years. but that’s not gonna fucking happen.

          Go fuck yourself with this blue conservative bullshit.

        • Wolfram@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          Go ahead and wait for the U.S. to implement a viable system. I’d bet it’ll be longer than our lifetimes before that even happens. And that’s ignoring what is probably the desire of keeping the status duo of a broken two party system like this.

        • Statfish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          Cool story, bro. How do you propose to do that? You got a magic wand? How many of those ballot initiatives failed this time around?

  • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    When you figure out that the United States was established by wealthy white males who owned slaves, had a revolution due to “no taxation without representation” but then purposefully ignored to repent the 99% until major reforms over the years, it makes sense.

    The first set presidential elections were only voted by a handful of Americans. Not the women. Not the slaves. Not the natives who were here first. The landowning white men.

    When we claimed England is a tyranny but abolished slavery and gave universal aufferage before we did, I think we lost that argument. America was built by out of touch white men, and it has always been ran by out of touch white men.

    • Bookmeat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Not to mention that the civil war was lost through the presidential election of 1876 even though it was won in battle before that. That election was so corrupt that the Union conceded a lot to get their president, including removing Federal forces from the South on the promise that the South would protect Federal rights of minorities, blacks, etc. (among other things) The North pulled out and the south reneged without consequence (the KKK was the strong arm then) until the Civil Rights act in the 60s. That’s only roughly 60 years ago. Most of the institutional segregation from before then is still firmly in place.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s amazing the stories that Americans tell themselves about the American Revolution. They pretend that the “founding fathers” were heroic idealists standing up for honorable values against an evil despotic regime. The truth is much more complicated.

      A major goal of the 7 Years War was about controlling the colonies in the Americas. Had the French won those wars, the modern people of North America would probably speak French. Look at how many US places still have French names, and especially are named after the French king: Louisiana, Louisville, St. Louis, Mobile, New Orleans, Baton Rouge, Detroit, Lafayette, Arkansas, Illinois, Calumet, Decatur, Boise, Montpelier, etc. But, the French lost the war, so the English took over all that territory. Fighting that war was incredibly expensive, but it was worth it for the English because they now controlled a whole new continent with all its resources. To pay for that war, they levied taxes. The English colonists in the US, who were largely the beneficiaries of that part of the war, decided they didn’t want to pay those taxes, so they rebelled. They got the benefit of a continent won for them by English armies, but without having to pay the bill for that fight. Now, again, it’s complicated. The English armies were integrated with the colonial armies. George Washington was initially an officer in the British army (and was part of starting the French and Indian wars, which became the 7-years-war). The US colonists were part of the force that fought against the French and their native allies.

      Anyhow, it was complicated. But, the end result was that after a war that took place both in Europe and in the Americas, the British crown had a huge debt. I have no idea what proportion of that debt was due to the part of the war fought in Europe vs. the part of the war fought in the Americas, but overall there was a big debt and the English crown tried to tax whoever they could to pay for it.

      Was the English king a tyrant? Sure. Did the Americans have fair representation in the English parliament? Probably not. But, their main reason for rebelling was the same one that is nearly always the cause of rebellions: the rebels are in an area that’s wealthy for some reason, and they don’t want to have to share that wealth with the rest of the country / empire. In fact, it was suspected that the colonists chose not to send representatives to the colonial assembly partially because they knew that if they did that it would undermine their “without representation” argument, and the real issue was that they simply didn’t want to pay taxes.

      As for the English system being tyrannical, the reality is that it has been a very slow, gradual change from an absolute monarchy to a ceremonial one. The English crown is significantly less wealthy than Elon Musk, and arguably has a lot less influence on British politics than Musk does on American politics.

      By the letter of the laws, the British system is still more classist and controlled by money than the American system. But, is that true if you look at the actual real way that power is used? It doesn’t seem like it to me.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Also say goodbye to internet freedom of speech, if even a small portion of Project 2025 comes into play. Anti-pornography activism sounds nice on paper, until you realize everyone has a different definition of pornography, and the people that want to ban porn the most have a rather interesting take on what constitutes as porn and what doesn’t…

    • Rolando@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      2 months ago

      FWIW most clowns are hard-working, skilled individuals who bring joy to people’s lives.

        • AsheHole@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I know you’re probably joking buttttt, I know a ton and can say it’s a mixed bag … Many clowns are like Santa’s and magicians…they’re not the most forward thinking and take themselves waaaay too seriously. Most new age and haunt clowns are cool peeps. It’s the old school “clowning art” gate keepers and the evangelical clowns that tend to be insufferable. Heavy mean girl vibes.

          • obscur_e@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            I was actually wondering because i dont know much about clowns, it’s interesting, iv heared only about some Gracy or Gacy clown but forgot what was the thing about him

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      155
      ·
      2 months ago

      The majority voted for the candidate I don’t like. That means democracy is broken.

      Trump said the exact same thing in 2020 and was rightly condemned for it. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. Get used to it.

      • ABCDE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        141
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        He literally said you won’t need to vote again. Fucking brain-dead take there.

        • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          73
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Threatening to use the armed forces against your political opponents is generally considered not a great sign for a democracy as well.

        • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          If only we had any historical examples from, say, the past century, showing that the way to stop fascism is NOT by voting the socialdemocrats/liberals into power…

        • CEbbinghaus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sorry. Can’t upvote your post coz its on 66 and this really does give “execute order 66” vibes

      • Lumisal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        54
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Republicans literally wrote a playbook on how they’re going to do it called Project 2025 ya dunce.

        It’s clear Americans need to learn the hard way just like Europe did a long time ago.

      • macniel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes democracy will be broken since Orangeman promised that this will be the last election you will ever need to vote in. Congrats.

      • Aganim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The majority voted for the candidate I don’t like. That means democracy is broken.

        Don’t worry, the US democracy was already broken. That became painfully clear when Trump started whining about not winning the popular vote when he was elected the first time. Being able to lose while having the support of the majority of voters is proof enough:

        Hillary: 65,853,625 votes

        Trump: 62,985,106 votes

        Not every vote has the same weight, which is just completely bonkers and proof that your archaic system is due for a retrofit. Let’s just hope it won’t get chucked away entirely in the coming years.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          FYI, Trump DID also win the popular vote this year. Perhaps it’s time to retire this argument.

          • Aganim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Why? Trump won fair (proverbial at least, I don’t think all the misinformation that has been spewed on X counts as ‘fair’) and square this year, but that doesn’t mean your system isn’t flawed. Votes from certain states still carry less weight due to improperly distributed electors. Same happened with Gore vs Bush by the way.

            • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              What part of “he won the popular vote” did you not understand? Across all states, more people voted for him than for Harris. Even if there was no electoral college, he would still be president.

              Unless you’re arguing that electoral college votes should be redistributed in a way that ensures the winner will always be a Democrat…

              • Aganim@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Across all states, more people voted for him than for Harris.

                I never said otherwise.

                Unless you’re arguing that electoral college votes should be redistributed in a way that ensures the winner will always be a Democrat…

                No, I’m saying that your system needs to be fixed so every vote has the same weight, that’s all. The fact that the term ‘popular vote’ exists at all is the flaw. Who won this year is irrelevant to the argument.

      • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think us non-USians are alluding to the clusterfuck of only having an either/or choice. That’s not how democracy works in most democratic places. There’s only ever two runners and riders that stand any real chance of winning over there. Most people would call that a fixed race.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          While there technically might be more choices available in other places (for instance, in Germany there’s usually at least 2-3 smaller parties that have a legitimate chance to make it into the Bundestag), de facto it still boils down to the two major parties (conservatives and social democrats) duking it out amongst themselves, and voting 3rd party is merely a matter of choosing who their junior partner will be. It might help sway the resulting coalition’s direction on some minor issues but the overall direction is still very much decided by the 500 lbs gorilla.

          • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Someone downvoted you for spitting facts? Interesting. The two US parties are both right of centre, which gives an immediate imbalance. Small parties can have some bearing on their senior partners policies, like you say. I’m assuming Germany has local elections, mayoral elections etc. surely some of the smaller, more niche parties, pick up seats in those if they happen. Trends identified by smaller parties will get picked up by bigger parties, so they serve their worth there, too.

            • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 days ago

              Someone downvoted you for spitting facts? Interesting.

              Certainly not the first time this has happened.

            • superkret@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Results of the last German Federal election:

              It’s really not 2 major parties and their junior partners anymore.

                • superkret@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Unfortunately, the day after Trump was elected, coalition talks between the non-nazi parties in Saxony, a German state, failed. Which means there is no likely way to build a government coalition without a re-election or admittting the far right party in that state now.
                  And the day after that, the center-left federal government coalition broke apart, leaving it without a majority, which will trigger an early federal election next year.
                  And with current sentiments, the result of that election will likely pose the exact same problem Saxony now has, but for all of Germany.

      • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is either bad faith or supreme levels of stupidity.

        Probably supreme levels of stupidity, caused by bad faith. Most people don’t get this dumb without a little elbow grease.

      • Rolando@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean… you’re kind of right, but this is a “read the room” situation.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        And yet not everyone votes or even has a chance to vote in this democracy. And don’t get me started on the college of representarives. Seems pretty broken to me.

      • greencactus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Congrats for getting the most downvotes on Lemmy I’ve ever seen. Which you absolutely deserve by the way, in my opinion.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 months ago

    US is system is so bad. The constant pandering to “founding fathers” as if it’s even possible to have strong enough vision that it would last 200+ years and refusal to innovate past the ridiculous two party system is just sad tbh.

    Yet nothing will change because you can’t change these things without a revolution apparently.

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 months ago

    Kind of feels like our “crossing the Rubicon” moment. Except instead of an intellgent and accomplished general leading an army, we got a clown leading a circus.

  • Sooperstition@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s a democracy controlled by people who don’t care about regular working people. It was designed by rich white dudes and slaveowners 250 years ago to protect and increase their wealth.

    Your institutions have failed you. Americans need to demand better and throw off the chains that the wealthy have put on them.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Part of that joke though is that they’re both exactly the same which is of course a false premise.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well I was posting it more to the point of the I am sure wave of people saying “Well I voted for the Dems” is fast approaching.