There’s just one catch: every atom in your body would be fully disassembled to the quantum level, effectively leaving your original body totally destroyed.

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        nope. just not possible with our current tech. im not aware of any tech that even lets you deposit an atom at a location on demand merely simulating ‘teleportation’

          • Kory@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 minutes ago

            Because it was nowhere to be found after the teleport.

            No seriously, I remember that too, but I think it was a photon.

        • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          There was talk about teleporting a photon, but it was a mathematically possible (but technologically impossible) theory. A whole human is a pipedream.

  • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I would absolutely volunteer for this, abso-friggin-lutely.

    If I die in the process, I’m not gonna know it, and new me ain’t gonna either. At least that’s how I see it.

    Now that trump won ill even volunteer to go first LOL.

  • The Pantser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    There’s just one catch: every atom in your body would be fully disassembled to the quantum level, effectively leaving your original body totally destroyed.

    So just like Star Trek

  • DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Even if they manage this, I’ll bet “you” die each time something 'effectively … destroy[s]" you down to a quantum level.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      That depends on the nature of what “you” ultimately turn out to be. I tend to suspect (though with only a suspicion to go on and not proof, I probably wouldn’t be volunteering) that what “you” ultimately are is the pattern of information stored in the structure of your brain, and thus, any sufficiently perfect copy of that information is the “same” person regardless of continuity of the body. Though creating a second copy before destroying the original would have the caveat that as soon as the second you exists, the different perspective and experience will lead them to diverge into two different people who both have equal claim to the original identity, so that I think to do this, you’d want to destroy the original slightly before, making the process more like resurrection in a new location.

    • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      There really should be a way around that part of things, maybe if the distance is short enough you could move particles instead of recreating them