Tech tycoon Elon Musk joined a call between US President-elect Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky the day after the presidential election, according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

  • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    Someone in another thread said that Trump could fire generals until he gets someone who is willing to use troops domestically.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      He honestly wouldn’t need to.

      In a past life I worked with a LOT of senior military folk for the purpose of grants and funding and the like. And basically anyone (guesstimating) above the rank of a Captain equivalent (outside of SF) is basically a lifer. And they very rapidly learn how political the upper echelons are and that they need to stay as neutral as possible to get further promotions and have good assignments.

      I could very much see various Lieutenants and even some Captains complain about leaving the Ukrainians to die. They will then be immediately told by the nearest Major or General that they are a disgrace to the uniform for refusing orders and blah blah blah. And that will propagate down the line so that the NCO who is ACTUALLY valued for their initiative understands that they will be brought up on treason if they violate these orders.

      Because those Generals? They build their entire lives around always being able to say “I was just following orders”. They KNOW when you get things in writing.

    • zante@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s not even worth comment. Was it LemmyUnder11 or something ?

      A president can’t a fire a general. He cannot fire a dozen generals an retain control of the military.

      • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        The president can’t? Let’s see of the Supreme Court has anything to say about that. Right now, I’m not confident the word can’t is in their dictionary as far as a president is concerned.

        • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Since Trump technically can’t commit crimes as a president, nothing is stopping him from killing the generals until they comply.

        • zante@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Theres an unfortunate autocorrect there that confuses my point :

          The president CAN fire a general, but he cannot fire 12 generals . That’s the point I want to make.