So by saying “OBJECTIVELY, depression is just in your head” you actually meant “well, depression isn’t just in your head, it encompasses the whole body and we all understand about how mind-body dualism is a naive concept and everything in your body affects your mind and the other way around. depression creates inflammation through-out the body, robbing it of vital functionality required to maintain proper homeostasis, leading to a feedback loop worsening the situation”?
That’s quite a lot of subtext for something that’s prescriptively opposite of the comment.
Are you sure you’re not just lying because you’re ashamed of having said something incorrect? Because to me, that seems much more simple of an explanation.
Imagine me writing “the earth is flat” and then arguing that if you read that as if I thought the earth was flat, you’re a moron, since I “obviously” meant that the Earth is of course actually an oblate spheroid. That would seem a tad silly, wouldn’t it?
You don’t understand what an example is? Dear lord.
You wrote that. It’s bullshit. Harmful bullshit, I might add. But you’re just not big enough of a person to admit to mistakes, even though we all make them.
Aww, is someone having to change their quote, because what they said was incorrect, but you can’t admit to it so you pretend you didn’t say what you actually did say?
You didn’t say “depression is in your head”. You said “Objectively, depression is JUST in your head.”
That’s something an overconfident moron with no understanding of psychiatry might say.
No, I am just still wondering if your reading comprehension can get any worse.
So by saying “OBJECTIVELY, depression is just in your head” you actually meant “well, depression isn’t just in your head, it encompasses the whole body and we all understand about how mind-body dualism is a naive concept and everything in your body affects your mind and the other way around. depression creates inflammation through-out the body, robbing it of vital functionality required to maintain proper homeostasis, leading to a feedback loop worsening the situation”?
That’s quite a lot of subtext for something that’s prescriptively opposite of the comment.
Are you sure you’re not just lying because you’re ashamed of having said something incorrect? Because to me, that seems much more simple of an explanation.
Imagine me writing “the earth is flat” and then arguing that if you read that as if I thought the earth was flat, you’re a moron, since I “obviously” meant that the Earth is of course actually an oblate spheroid. That would seem a tad silly, wouldn’t it?
You have pretty much has written that the earth is flat, sweetie 😂
You don’t understand what an example is? Dear lord.
You wrote that. It’s bullshit. Harmful bullshit, I might add. But you’re just not big enough of a person to admit to mistakes, even though we all make them.
Well, OBJECTIVELY depression is in your head, sweetheart. You still don’t get it, do you?
Aww, is someone having to change their quote, because what they said was incorrect, but you can’t admit to it so you pretend you didn’t say what you actually did say?
You didn’t say “depression is in your head”. You said “Objectively, depression is JUST in your head.”
That’s something an overconfident moron with no understanding of psychiatry might say.
Are you a little bit slow?
Why do you keep replying?
You’re just digging a deeper pit of hot shame.
You’re pretending that you didn’t say “Objectively, depression is JUST in your head?”
Or are you gonna pretend the “just” wasn’t in there and you meant the opposite of what you said?
Can’t answer any of these questions?
Maybe just stop replying if you can’t admit to the silly things you said.