• BrikoX
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    That is only true if other apps have the same operating system access as iCloud. If others apps can’t perform the same actions because of vendor lock in, that’s anticompetitive monopolistic behavior. Apple already failed to dismiss identical lawsuit in US, so the lawsuit is at least valid on its face.

    • Puttaneska@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      What can’t you do on Dropbox that you can do with iCloud?

      Dropbox seems to behave the same in Finder; you can add tags, organise, etc.

      • BrikoX
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Isn’t Finder a macOS app? Lawsuit is only about iOS.

        • Puttaneska@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sorry I didn’t actually read it.

          Yes Finder is the macOS analogue of the iOS Files app. As far as I can see Dropbox and Files are pretty similar too. iOS Dropbox lacks tags, though.

          Sounds like Which‘s beef is with photo syncing. They think that the Photos app should be able to sync with clouds other than iCloud…?

          • BrikoX
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Issue is that 3rd party apps doesn’t have the same system access as iCloud. So you can’t use any other cloud the same way you can iCloud. So by definition that’s anticompetitive, since you have no options.