free@rss.ponder.catMB to BBC@rss.ponder.catEnglish · 1 month agoMoment MP leads haka to disrupt New Zealand parliamentwww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square3fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down11cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up15arrow-down1external-linkMoment MP leads haka to disrupt New Zealand parliamentwww.bbc.comfree@rss.ponder.catMB to BBC@rss.ponder.catEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square3fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squaremakingStuffForFun@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoSo, what is the change to the interpretation? I didn’t see it mentioned.
minus-squaremakingStuffForFun@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoThank you. Interesting times ahead it seems. If you support it, you’d be seen as racist. I’d you reject it, you might be stopping clarifying specifics. Although what those specifics are, and what clarity that brings, I’m a little unsure of. Interesting comment on that article. By sharing governance, you don’t have democracy. I can imagine a few people would feel that way. However, the land was taken, via treaty, and I guess some people want clarification. Compared to Australia, which took the land without treaty, nor spoils of war. Australia is on shaky ground.
So, what is the change to the interpretation? I didn’t see it mentioned.
This is the bill in question.
Thank you. Interesting times ahead it seems.
If you support it, you’d be seen as racist. I’d you reject it, you might be stopping clarifying specifics.
Although what those specifics are, and what clarity that brings, I’m a little unsure of.
Interesting comment on that article. By sharing governance, you don’t have democracy. I can imagine a few people would feel that way.
However, the land was taken, via treaty, and I guess some people want clarification.
Compared to Australia, which took the land without treaty, nor spoils of war. Australia is on shaky ground.