Also: how do you identify a work as peer reviewed?

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    That is because the first 4 or so words are about the topic. And then is a long paragraph describing something else. And I didn’t do any accusations. I pointed out that those several sentences are about reproducibility and not to be mistaken for the topic at hand. And they are. So I don’t get it, I don’t think I made any whoopsie. I just pointed out that we’re now talking about a different topic and reproducibility isn’t review. Which is true… Seems to me everyone is right? I don’t see any factual disagreement here. And if my “accusation” is saying they talked about reproducibility… That’s kind of what happened?!