Summary

Trump’s popular vote share has fallen below 50% to 49.94%, with Kamala Harris at 48.26%, narrowing his margin of victory.

Trump’s share of the popular vote is lower than Biden’s in 2020 (51.3%), Obama’s in 2012 (51.1%) and 2008 (52.9%), George W. Bush’s in 2004 (50.7%), George H.W. Bush’s in 1988 (53.2%), Reagan’s in 1984 (58.8%) and 1980 (50.7%), and Carter’s in 1976 (50.1%).

The 2024 election results highlight Trump’s narrow victory and the need for Democrats to address their mistakes and build a diverse working-class coalition.

The numbers also give Democrats a reason to push back on Trump’s mandate claims, noting most Americans did not vote for him.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      Your question doesn’t make any sense, but I was being polite.

      The scenario described is illustrating how lobsided small states’ electoral votes are. With 22% of the popular vote a candidate can with the electoral vote. Their opponent gets the other 78% of the popular vote.

      It’s always an air-quotes “win” of the popular vote in America because we don’t use the popular vote to determine the winner.

      The video is short. I’ve spent longer talking about it than the runtime of it. Just go watch it if you want the content explained.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        i believe in the original comment, i was referring to the popular vote, you could surmise i was talking about the electoral vote if you thought i was somehow converting elector votes into percentage points. But that would be weird.

        iirc my original statement was that you need a certain minimum percent of the votes to officially win the popular vote, irrelevant to the electoral vote.

        It seems like you’re abstracting winning the popular vote, to winning the election, which are two vastly different concepts, as is winning the electoral vote.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          26 days ago

          It seems like you’re abstracting winning the popular vote, to winning the election, which are two vastly different concepts, as is winning the electoral vote.

          I’m literally not doing that, just watch the video if you’re confused. You can win over 50% of the electoral vote with as little as 22% of the popular vote by winning the smallest states first because they have proportionally more votes. I fear I can’t make this simpler for you to understand. The video is like five minutes.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              26 days ago

              is this the electoral college win, or did they “win” the popular vote since they had more of the votes than the opponent.

              • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                24 days ago

                You can win the presidency with as little as 22% of the popular vote.

                interesting, don’t see anything about winning the popular presidential election here

                  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    cake
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    23 days ago

                    no but that was also me asking a clarifying question, because i knew you were talking about the electoral college, and i was talking about the popular presidential vote.