Possibly linuxM to Captain's messEnglish · 1 month agoHot patching should be the normimagemessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up130arrow-down13
arrow-up127arrow-down1imageHot patching should be the normPossibly linuxM to Captain's messEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square4fedilink
minus-squarerefalo@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 month agoAgreed. Ubuntu keeps this behind a paywall (or maybe just a sell-your-data wall), but I see no reason the same patches can’t be built and provided for free.
minus-squarePossibly linuxOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoI can understand why I suppose I was more talking about Windows and Android. Windows recently got hot patching support but it is only on Windows server.
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoAndroid updates are large enough that I imagine every single one comes with a new kernel and core libraries. Exchanging those without a reboot is hard and usually not worth the risk. On Windows, that’s a central architectural decision made on the 90s. It won’t change.
minus-squarePossibly linuxOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoWell hot patching is a thing on Windows when you pay the right price
Agreed. Ubuntu keeps this behind a paywall (or maybe just a sell-your-data wall), but I see no reason the same patches can’t be built and provided for free.
I can understand why I suppose
I was more talking about Windows and Android. Windows recently got hot patching support but it is only on Windows server.
Android updates are large enough that I imagine every single one comes with a new kernel and core libraries.
Exchanging those without a reboot is hard and usually not worth the risk.
On Windows, that’s a central architectural decision made on the 90s. It won’t change.
Well hot patching is a thing on Windows when you pay the right price