So as I look to build my first dedicated media server, I’m curious about what OS options I have which will check all the boxes. I’m interested in Unraid, and if there’s a Linux distro that works especially well I’d be willing to check that out as well. I just want to make sure that whatever I pick, I can use qbittorrent, Proton, and get the Arr suite working

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Depends on your experience, hardware, and other stuff.

    You could easily use Debian or Ubuntu server and install Docker if all you want is those listed services installed on unRAIDed drives.

    You could try something like Dietpi (which is what Ive used since I started self hosting) which simplifies a few things and gives some helpful scripts on top of a basic Debian installation. It’s a simple setup but still just plain ol’ Debian so easy to set up however you like.

    You could use something like CasaOS or ZimaOS which offer Web interfaces and integrate with docker for those with a “no tech” background up to technical users.

    ProxMox is an option, but takes a lot of learning proxmox-specific stuff and IMO might be a bit overkill for your first server.

    Personally, I’d go for something accessible to your tastes because everything nowadays has some kind of “easy setup” path for Plex/Jelly + Arr. Once it’s set up, use it! Then once you need a big change for better hardware or more bespoke software setups then start digging into more fancy setups.

    • DonnieDarkmode@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I actually want to prioritise the data protection of some sort of RAID setup, and support for torrenting and whatnot would be secondary to that. Really what I’m trying to avoid is installing and setting up my system only to find out that the OS I’ve picked is terrible for torrenting afterwards.

      I have a workable setup on consumer Windows 11 right now, so I see the next step as having a dedicated Media Server box which can give me plenty of storage, data protection (right now a drive failure would wipe out half my server), and room for future expansion. Once that’s sorted, then I’ll look into the Arr suite and more advanced torrenting stuff. I want to pick something good for that stuff now, though, so I don’t have a ton of headache down the road

      • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 minutes ago

        I think there’s some deffo better OSes than my suggestions for RAID setups and stuff, bar ProxMox. Maybe it is worth you looking into those options!

        That being said, any OS can torrent shit just fine. If it can run Docker or other containers (so 99% of suggestions here) you’re set.

        Maybe if you can spare the hardware try setting up a RAID on a couple of different ISOs to test em. That’ll be the harder, or more permanent, aspect of the setup I think.

  • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m currently playing with setting up a home server on an old PC, using Proxmox as the main OS and using LXC and VMs for the services, not fully set up yet (still working on figuring out reverse proxy to make my services available on the internet)

    It’s neat tho, and there’s some helpful scripts for installing various containers and things online.

    • DonnieDarkmode@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I would need that because I’m basically starting from zero with learning all this stuff lol. Using Tautulli remotely is a challenge for me right now if that gives any indication of my level of knowledge here

  • supplier [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I’ve been running my stack on FreeBSD for a while now. I cannot recommend it enough; solid as a rock, no surprises. BSD license is different from GPL though, so some software cannot be migrated with the same name, but there are drop in replacements that are usually better anyway.

  • nis@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I use Unraid on my NAS. I like it for storage, I don’t like it for running services. It’s still running my media stack, but only until I get that moved to a Debian server.

    Depending on how involved you want to be and what you want to learn, Unraid might be a good fit for you. It’s easy and mostly just works.

    • adhocfungus@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s what I’m running. I’m sure you could squeeze more performance out of a specialized OS, but headless Debian is fast and easy enough.

    • compostgoblin@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Are there any resources available for how to do this? I feel like I more or less understand how Docker works conceptually, but every time I try to actually use it, I feel in over my head very quickly

  • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I have been fighting with Docker and Fedora on these exact items all weekend. Good luck

    • Policeshootout@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I just recently discovered proxmox and am slowly moving my docker containers off my NAS. Picked up a used Intel NUC, i5-8259, 32gb ram, 512gb HDD. It’s been great so far, very happy with its ability paired with proxmox.

        • Policeshootout@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Performance mostly, encoding is better, reducing load on my NAS and using it specifically for storage. Immich performs better as well, it’s pretty resource hungry I found. I also am planning to set up Frigate for home security and that’s the main reason I wanted something with a bit more power.

  • cybirdman@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I use Unraid and I’m loving it. Super stable, easy to manage, set up dockers, let’s me pool my hard drives and set up parity. Highly recommend. Only thing that I’ve had a hard time with is finding a stable flash drive - you’d be surprised how many start to fail when used 24/7

    • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The thumb drive isn’t used all the time. I’ve been using a cheap USB drive that cost me like $12 several years ago, and haven’t had any issues yet. It’s been running constantly for the last year or two.

      • cybirdman@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I had an issue recently where my usb drive was “disconnecting” which triggered unraid to give read errors and then panicking. I had checked though and it wasn’t being regularly read or written to but still caused my whole server to crash. Changing usb drive has since fixed it, for now 😄

    • Kettrick@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Unraid would be a very good choice for someone who is reaching out and asking this question. Debian can do the same but I suspect it’ll be easier to setup and manage on unraid.

      Disk management in unraid is also great.

    • maxprime@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Came here to suggest unraid as well. There are probably better options, but for a first timer, I can’t imagine a better solution. The ability to just add a hard drive to the array with virtually not configuration, as well as adding up to two parity disks is great. Caching is super easy too.

      Plus they now support zfs so there’s that.

  • Dempf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Now that Truenas Scale supports just plain Docker (and it’s running on Debian) I think it’s a great option for an all-in-one media box. I’ve had my complaints with Truenas over the years, but it’s done a really great job at preventing me from shooting myself in the foot when it comes to my data.

    I believe raidz expansion is also now in stable (though still better to do a bit of planning for your pool before pulling the trigger).

    • DonnieDarkmode@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The raidz stuff, as I understand it, seems pretty compelling. A setup where I can lose any given drive and replace it with no data loss would be very ideal. So I would just run TrueNAS scale, through which would manage my drives, and then install everything else in docker containers or something?

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I assume any Linux or *BSD distro will work, especially one with Docker (which is most/all of them?) so you don’t have to worry about things being packaged for your distro so long as there’s a docker image. My server is Alpine Linux.

    • DonnieDarkmode@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      So openmediavault running on the server, and then use one of the other two to get PMS, Proton VPN, qbittorrent, etc.?

    • Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I wouldn’t use Arch on a Server. Everything you install will probably be in a docker container anyway, so fast updates for system packages isn’t important compared to stability. Good choices would be Debian or Fedora Server. I personally use Fedora but the reason is just that I use Fedora on Desktop too, so I know they have really good defaults (They’re really fast in adopting new stuff like Wayland, Pipewire, BTRFS with encryption and so on) and it’s nice that Cockpit us preinstalled, so I can do a lot of stuff using a WebUI. Debian is probably more stable tho, with Fedora there is a chance that something could break (even though it’s still pretty small) but Devian really just works always. The downside is of course very outdated packages but, as I said, on a Server that doesn’t matter because Docker containers update independetly from the system.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Nah me neither, I had my desktop mindset going there. I use truenas scale, couldn’t be happier.