• rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Most of those run OpenWrt or PfSense. Assuming the hardware is well-supported by the open source software it runs, there’s a argument to be made that there’s no difference. There’s always the risk of them using some weird chipset that won’t be supported in a year’s time. The only difference is that the OpenWrt One is specifically designed for OpenWrt with well-supported hardware.

    • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      how good is openwrt these days? i used it a long time ago on tp link hardware are remember it was not too good…like adding own scripts, addons etc. and then i tried stuff like ipfire,ipcop and pfsense. pfsense was so much better and now opensense is quite good. how does current openwrt compare?

      • philpo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        OPNsense is like comparing a bicycle to a car (in Europe) Both will get you there,the first one is more convenient most of the time for most users,but the second one is a whole class of “more powerful”. But it’s far easier to take a shortcut with a bike.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’ve been using it on my last 2 routers, currently the Netgear WAX206 and I’m loving it.

        It does what it’s supposed to. No complaints.