• hddsx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean if that is how they feel. Might as well be consistent. /me shrugs

        • Ubermeisters
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is an extremely Republican train of thought, are you sure you’re on the right side of the table here?

          • hddsx@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            What does political affiliation have to do with anything here?

            In a global utilitarianism point of view, the best course of action is not to pursue that.

            I’m a kantian point of view, there are no exceptions to rules. If you find an exception, it’s a bad rule and needs to be rewritten.

            I’m taking a kantian ethics point of view. Why does this appear to be Republican to you?

      • n2burns@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        48
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        So you’re suggesting ruining someone’s life because you’re pissy about political theatrics they are a criminal?

        FTFY.

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The party of personal responsibilitylaw and order … fuck you, I got mine.

      • toasteecup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not saying to do it. I’m simply pointing out that it’s an option and not an amazing one at that.