• nednobbins@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Part of the point of the peer review process is to check for that. This kind of satay would be very hard to fake well enough to pass the scrutiny of a bunch of skeptical scientists. And if it passes that any scientist will be able to do the same. Being able to force an other scientist to retract a Nature paper would be a high prize for any academic.

    • chillinit@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Part of the point of the peer review process is to check for that.

      LMFAO. It’s authoritarian China.

        • chillinit@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          It’s China, who’s authoritarian governance controls the dataset.

          The fucking paper even says so itself in the abstract, lmao.