• Altima NEO
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    133
    ·
    1 year ago

    Probably because that’s not how the first amendment works.

    • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      IANAL but, if it’s a publicly owned and operated library, and someone acting on behalf of the government fired these people for some sort of protected speech (which isn’t always just talking/writing) then I’m pretty sure that’s a 1a violation.

      Though I could use some clarity on any distinction between a persons own speech, and speech that could be seen as that of the library.

    • 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚐@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Strange how certain types incorrectly construe constitutional right violations with businesses but completely overlook state enforcement as literal infringement by government. Big gubmint isn’t just federal.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Freedom of speech is the right to not be punished by the government, not private people.

        I could be fired from a job for saying I like the Ninja Turtles and the newest remake wasn’t that bad. But the govt can’t do shit about my awesome movie choices.

        Now this is a library, so I think it would come down to who runs it and their policies. For example, I was in the USMC and while I uniform I couldn’t openly support any political stances or party.