• Nazrin@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think we’re safe, but I wouldn’t put it past those other lemmy instances to bend to the will of facebook to be facebook compatible.

    • Disa@burggit.moeM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      If this happens, you might see the very first defederation from our end. lol.

      • Marimfisher@burggit.moe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let’s be honest, the first podunk blog to associate us with a corporate entity like Facebook is resulting in immediate defederation on Facebook’s end. I’m overall cool with defederating any megacorp/government instance tbh.

  • Sheep@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In theory good because we absolutely need interoperability between services.

    In practice I know this is just meta trying to find a way to harvest data on as many users as possible. I hate that if I interact with a user on threads that likely means Facebook is getting my data which sucks because I want the service to be open but I don’t want to subject myself to privacy invasion.

    Plus the whole embrace, expand, extinguish thing which I don’t think is overblown at all. It’s literally how these corporations work by design.

  • mabtheseer@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not seeing any issue with the scorched earth approach of defederating on this one. Facebook isn’t a good actor acting on the greater good here. They just seem to be hoping to pick up on Twitters current weakness while they have a nutjob as a CEO. They want market dominance and profits selling user data and ads.

  • SmolSlime@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Kinda worrying tbh. With Meta being Meta, I’m afraid they’re trying to capitalize the whole Fediverse and farming more data at the same time. I really hope other instances start defederating them. Let them be their own walled garden.

  • Pies@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    New to the whole fediverse thing, but if any instance I’m on federate with Facebook/Meta, I’m leaving that instance.

    I was done with Facebook since 2013 and don’t plan on ever becoming a product after a decade.

  • siota@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I definitely think they pose a threat to the overall health of the Fediverse. Nothing good has ever come from Mark Zuckerberg, and Threads wouldn’t be using ActivityPub if he didn’t think he could wrangle control of the standard itself from us like the aforementioned ruining of XMPP.

  • ghost_in_the_code@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was on FB since college in 2005. I was on when it was college kids only, then high school kids, then our parents. As FB wanted more money I saw the decline each time. Whatever they touch becomes corrupt and unholy. I doubt it would halogen but if Burggit federates with Threads then I’m out. I want to move away from corporate.

    • SmolSlime@burggit.moe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tbh there’s no way Meta will try to federate with this instance anyway, judging by what kind of content is posted here.