• ogeist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Can’t wait to see the Netflix adaptation again with Henry Cavill as Ciri.

  • samus12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Super hyped, I’ve wanted a sequel with Ciri since finishing 3.

    Please don’t Cyberpunk this up, CDPR…

    • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      They will cyberpunk this, because they also witchered Cyberpunk. As in “delivered less than promised and then mostly fixed it with patches”.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        And I’m quick to forget that Witcher 3 had some nasty bugs at launch, too. I was stuck with at that damn giant in the ice cave for like a month before they fixed it.

      • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yep, it’s their business model. People were pissed about Cyberpunk because they’d only played Witcher 3 after it was complete.

        • DrDystopia@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I love 2077 but CDPR keeps on ruining my modded excellence with worthless patches. I wish they’d just give up and leave it to the many amazing modders to add content and fixes. 🤷‍♂️

        • Raab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          As with The Witcher 3, which is now regarded as one of the best games of all time.

          • SuperSaiyanSwag
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Witcher 3 came out in May of 2015 and set the record for goty awards at the time. I don’t think it took that long to patch it up.

            • Raab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I distinctly remember it taking at least until the first expansion for it to be considered one of the greats. GOTY Awards have never been a true tell for quality of a game in my opinion.

              • SuperSaiyanSwag
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                I think it took a month for it to be polished enough. I remember this because it was when cdpr spun its upcoming patches into a great pr move by calling them “free dlc”. I think it was like 11-12 weeks of continuous “dlc” and Reddit was eating that up and dunking on other devs while praising the game to be the best game of all time. I legitimately remember post on Reddit showing some glitches in the game and comments saying something like “the game is glitchy, but at least it’s just funny glitches and nothing game breaking”. Also, first expansion came out 5 months after the release, so it still tracks that the game was patched up somewhat quick.

          • samus12345@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Witcher 3 was buggy, but still a great game at launch. No so with Cyberpunk.

  • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Is it just me or is her face a bit weird? Like too much jaw?

    I’d love to play the game as Ciri though, hope they make up a good story, it felt the Wild Hunt was her story, IDK what can top that.

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      I agree.

      As someone else pointed out, Geralt looked quite different in the game vs the first cinematic launch trailer.

      https://youtu.be/Swij8vsEEgQ

      So who knows, time will tell. Also keep in mind it’s a new engine

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It looks like they created a monster trying to fit a bunch of features in a face. It’s on all thumbnails, same as clickbait videos. It’s a marketing stunt.

    • icecreamtaco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Reminds me of xiv. It always looks great ingame but half the time their cgi trailers mess up peoples face anatomy

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Her face looks longer to me. I assume they’re trying to make her look more like a real person.

      • Fades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 minutes ago

        You’re the one taking it to gooner/sexist territory, us fans of the series know the characters and when the overall face-shape changes but keeps defining features like the scar on her cheek, it’s a little unexpected and strange at first.

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I was not commenting on her attractiveness, just that the defining character features seem to be different. She doesn’t look “older” or less attractive to me from Wild Hunt, just a different person.

        It’s not as bad as when they dropped the voice actor for Sam Fisher in Splinter Cell though.

  • filister@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I was hoping for Eskel or Letho to be honest. Ciri is a safe choice but a bit on the boring side. Eskel would have been a lot more multi-layered protagonist and dialogues would have been funnier.

    • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I was praying for Letho even though we all knew it was going to be Ciri (for better or worse, we’ll see).

      Leaning into the moral grey of the Witcher world with Letho would have been awesome, he says (in one of the endings to his story) he’ll head out east over the mountains so we could have gotten some all-new environments and it would have been 100% CDPR IP so they could have done whatever they wanted without trampling over lore too much. Plus Letho is just an amazing character with huge protagonist energy. Oh well.

    • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Same. I was hoping for a totally different story or a different time period entirely. Instead it’s just boring Ciri again. Rip.

      • Fades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 minutes ago

        2.5 games of geralt? Just fine! 0.5 games as ciri? BoRiNg!!!

        Yes ciri “existed” in the previous games but we never saw her and we never played as her until the Wild Hunt.

    • pigup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I liked gwent. Tried the app, didn’t understand wtf was happening, deleted it.

    • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I did. The games already completely shit on the ciri book lore. I was hoping for a fresh slate with new characters, perhaps during a different time period entirely.

          • Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I don’t know how it would’ve tied into the “Witcher” arc… because I don’t think they were around yet? But I would have loved to had a game set during the “Conjunction of the Spheres”.

            • djsoren19@yiffit.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I think you’re both asking for the same thing. IIRC my lore correctly, Witcher clans were founded after the Conjunction to deal with the sudden influx of monsters. A game about the first Witcher could be set mere months after the event.

              • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                I sound like a huge nerd here but i believe witchers were created 500 years prior when the humans first got to the continent and encountered monsters. Both humans and monsters came from the conjunction. It is never explained what humans were doing for the first 1000 years after the conjunction (conjunction was 1500 years ago) prior to arriving on the continent. I assume they also had to deal with monsters or maybe the monsters were dropped only on the continent? No idea. The author was unfortunately not very consistent or clear on historic lore. Perhaps it was intended. I’m not sure.

                Source: I spent way too much time looking at lore explanations and engaging on forums.

            • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Huh? What do you mean? I’m saying i would have liked to play as the first witcher, which would have taken place 400 years or so prior to the first game.

              Edit: apologies i misunderstood your comment. See my below response. A game based on the conjunction would have been awesome. Too bad.

              • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                They meant they wanted a game set during the conjunction of the spheres but didn’t know if witchers were a thing yet at that timeframe in the lore. The wording made it seem like they were talking about your first witcher idea but they were talking about a different alternate timeframe setting they’d like to see.

                • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Ah gotchya. Thank you. Yes, in the lore (as best I can remember) there were no witchers during the conjunction. It was when humans first appeared.

          • djsoren19@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Every game feels a bit broad. Even if just for the sake of development, I’m okay with story-focused games having pre-built characters. Especially if we’re not actually meant to like or agree with the character we’re playing as, such as Martin Walker in Spec-Ops: The Line.

            • apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              43 minutes ago

              If we’re following rediquette, (if such a thing still exists or can even be applied to Lemmy) downvotes shouldn’t be used on things you disagree with.

            • wcSyndrome@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I didn’t downvote but I disagree. It is nice to be able to roleplay your own character but I also like having well written established characters

              • wia@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                They don’t have to be mutually exclusive. Mass Effect worked.

          • N1ghtstalk3r@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            You’re getting downvoted but I agree, to an extent. If it’s an RPG telling a grand story, and not an individual piece dedicated to a unique individual, then yes.

      • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        So did I, but I mean, given the current game development climate, Ciri was an extremely predictable pick.

        Not only is Ciri a woman, which modern games seem to be making super majority of main protagonists these days, but she also has market familiarity. Her character is recognizable and therefore has a builtin audience, where a new character does not.

        • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          If women make up around 50% of the people on earth, shouldn’t they make up around 50% of the main characters?

          • felykiosa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I think that wanting equality over men/women % of MC is not something you would want to focus on I would rather have a quality story and universe whatever of the gender of the MC.

            ( I will clarify my point , I am an human therefore I am for gender equality obviously but I don’t think that this metric is the most interesting )

            • Silverseren@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              54 minutes ago

              I mean, I agree. But, based on that argument, it’s totally fine if 100% of pre-created MCs are women then, since it’s only the story and universe that are important (and I would be 100% a-ok with that happening).

            • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 hours ago

              I completely agree that the quality of the story is kinda the whole point, but I am tired of seeing comments like the one RightHand made; complaining that she is a woman just because she is a woman.

              • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                It isn’t a complaint, simply an observation. I usually pick to play as a woman in games I can choose the gender of the protagonist anyway.

                • havocpants@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  Same. If I’m going to have to look at an ass for 40 hours of gameplay, I’d rather it was a woman’s ass.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Besides, they’ve already established some of her signature abilities and had people play as her in some of the previous game, kicking the familiarity up an extra notch.

          • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Yep. Ciri isnt the worst choice in the world, I just was hoping I could have played as my own character instead. It will be interesting to see what they do with the story.

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Yeah, I’d have preferred making my own character too but, failing that, a great character that’s already established in the series and has been a lot of fun playing as so far ain’t bad either!

          • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I really hope they don’t stick with Ciri gameplay from TW3, I never liked when I was forced to play as Ciri, her abilities was less fun than Geralt signs.

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Judging by the video, she’ll be behaving more like a witcher, with the two swords, the signs, and the potion quaffing. If they hold to that and also let her keep her “short teleport” move from TW3, I’m looking forward to it 🙂

              • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                If they changed the double dodge = roll to double dodge = short teleport, but not as crazy as in TW3 that would be cool, they could also make the whole gameplay more agile than TW3, seems like a good fit for Ciri.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      19 hours ago

      In my opinion it doesn’t make all that much sense because of major Witcher 3 spoilers.

      • spooky_mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        WITCHER 3 SPOILER BELOW

        Spoiler

        How so? One of the endings literally has geralt gift a witcher sword to Ciri. The only thing I’m confused about is how she now seems to have the witcher mutations

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          16 hours ago
          Witcher books spoiler

          One of the early Witcher books mentioned that Ciri was given some witcher drugs while she was training at Kaer Morhen, but didn’t undergo the trial of the grasses at Triss’ request.

          • generaldenmark@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago
            Continuation of the book spoilers

            Wacky books tbh. I don’t remember thinking it was for her to undergo trail they gave it to her, but mostly because that’s all they really knew to do

      • rtxn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        It makes perfect sense with two of the three endings, and could even work with the third depending on how much CDPR wants to explain the cosmology behind the white frost.

          • djsoren19@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Is it really that hard to imagine she eventually undertook the Trial? Yeah Kaer Morhen lost the ability to administer the Trial, but there’s like 10 different Witcher “schools.” Maybe we’ll see Ciri working with the School of the Crane or w/e.

            • Don_alForno@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              As far as we know it has never been done on a woman or an adult. Also, she already has super powers. Why risk a procedure that only 3 in 10 young boys used to survive?

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          It’s almost definitely a break with the series in that you likely won’t be able to import your save file, which always was a core feature of the series. There are also other lore details that don’t add up here, which have already been explained. There could’ve been many ways to progress the story but I don’t see how that is possible here. It’s most likely a soft reboot.

          • rtxn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            It could work the same way as the three origin stories in CP77: each ending from The Witcher 3 leading to a separate intro story with a time skip before the main game begins.

            • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 hours ago

              I guess that could be possible though I doubt it. The 3 origin stories in Cyberpunk were extremely shallow and didn’t add anything to the story. I don’t see why they would go for it again when it didn’t work out last time.

          • N1ghtstalk3r@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Some games do allow you to import saves from older games that have swapped the MC. They just take the choices you made in the story arc and use that to create conditions for the world you’re now in. But it’s a rare occasion from what I know.

  • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Honestly after their absolute shit show with cyberpunk I’m more excited to sit back and watch them fuck it up again than for the game. They’ve lost my respect and their credibility as developers. I will pirate anything from them

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They’ve given Cyberpunk 4 years of support for free since the initial launch, including a full overhaul of the game. I get the state of the launch was dogshit, and you can bet your ass I’m not pre-ordering, but still holding onto this grudge is just petty. How much more sorry do you need them to be?

      • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I paid dlc isn’t free support.

        I don’t need them to be sorry. They had years to make the game and released garbage. I’m sick of that happening in the gaming industry and I don’t support companies that do it.

        • djsoren19@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Well good news, because you don’t need to pay a dime to get updated to version 2.2 and receive all the free updates. Phantom Liberty is a cool story, but has zero impact on gameplay.

    • filister@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They fixed CP2077 and as a matter of fact the game is pretty good, plus they are a European company so we should support them.

      • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I haven’t played the game since launch so maybe I outta give it another try but I still lost respect for them. Releasing an unfinished product shouldn’t be praised even if they did fix it. Should’ve been delayed in the first place.

        Why does them being European mean we should support them tho?

      • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Yeah, they did. I wasn’t a fan of every part of Cyberpunk 2077, but I have to hand it to them: the gameplay was pretty solid compared to the mess I read about at launch. They even made the player controls responsive and reasonably nice to use. That alone was a huge improvement over The Witcher 3.

        (Geralt, I’ll never forgive you for all the times you stepped forward into danger when I pressed back to avoid it, or decided to fiddle about with a candle when there was something more important for your hands to do, or moved like a lumbering sloth instead of… well… a witcher.)

        I’m optimistic about this one.

    • Blahnominous@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Yeah it was a rough launch. I just picked it up during the last steam sale and it’s fucking amazing now though! I can’t put it down!

      • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I should give it another try but they stopped updating the game. I’m not expecting them to be like no man’s sky but you still need mods to add in shit that was promised like the metro system

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      The devs are amongst the best in the business, blame those responsible, the suits who demand unfinished products to be released. Nintendo with their older mentality of shipping phyisical media does not have the luxury to ship an unfinished product and more studios need to take a page from their book.

      A rushed product is forever stained by its bad launch, a delayed product is eventually good. People have been waiting for star citizen for over a decade, we can be patient.

      • Boy of Soy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Nintendo is a shit company that hates its fans. Definitely not who I would use as a good example. And star citizen is a scam, not a game.

  • Mandy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Here goes the cycle anew. Thank you CD project red and all the consoomers happily enabling then.