Summary

Crystal Mangum, who accused three Duke lacrosse players of rape in 2006, admitted for the first time on a podcast that her claims were fabricated.

She said she lied for validation and apologized to Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty, and David Evans, acknowledging they “didn’t deserve” the accusations.

The case, which drew national attention, collapsed after evidence disproved her story, leading to the disbarment of Durham DA Mike Nifong for misconduct.

Mangum is currently in prison for a 2011 murder conviction.

  • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    No, it would not be a valid concern. If your accusation is not a lie, you’d be fine.

    Many attackers may be content to escape with a “not guilty” ruling if the prosecution isn’t able to prove their case but some are certain to try and hit back through the legal system

    If there is zero evidence of deliberate lying, how do you expect such an attempt to ever go anywhere, much less reach a courtroom?

    The only way I could see such a thing even getting off the ground immediately after trial is if, during that trial, direct evidence of lying came to light (e.g. video recording of the event in question showing an obviously-consensual sex act, or no sex act at all, or evidence of the accuser admitting the accusation to be a lie, etc.).

    The vast majority of accused would not be in any position to ‘retaliate’ this way, and the few who are, only are because they’re justified in doing so.

    • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’d recommend looking up The Innocence Project to see examples of cases where false accusations result in convictions but you’re already familiar with their work.

    • Reyali@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yeah, it’s a great idea. Because innocent people are never convicted in our justice system.

      Because people never abuse the legal system with bogus lawsuits.

      Because police aren’t more likely to be abusers themselves and therefore more likely to take the side of another abuser against a victim.

      Because someone who is willing to rape someone isn’t ever likely to try to exert more power over them.

      Because laws are always applied evenly and justly across all races, sexes, social classes, identities.

      Because sexual assault victims feel totally empowered by our legal system and society as long as they’re telling the truth.

      Oh wait, none of those things are true.

      So no, it’s not a great idea. Not until we fix a fuck ton of other problems in our society and justice system.

      Libel, slander, and perjury are already illegal. Let’s use existing laws rather than introducing something new that can make it even harder for real victims.

      • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s amazing how some people hate men so much that they’ll go to bat harder for hypothetical women than actual men, who have been falsely accused.

        Pitiful.