• Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Capitalism is totally different from a ponzi scheme. In a ponzi scheme, the profits go up to the person at the top and you always need new people that come in, otherwise the whole thing will fall apart and the people at the bottom will be the ones that suffer. Under capitalism however, the profits of everyone’s work will go up to the top and you always need new workers to come in, otherwise the system will fall apart and the people at the bottom will suffer. Totally different.

        • LandedGentry
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          That’s still not a Ponzi scheme even if it isn’t sustainable.

          • qaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            I think it actually fits quite well.

            A Ponzi scheme is a form of fraud that lures investors and pays profits to earlier investors with funds from more recent investors.

            Meanwhile, the current pension system in most countries depend on a growing population to spread out the payments for pensioners over multiple workers.

            Ponzi schemes collapse when there aren’t enough investors to sustain the dividends to be paid to the existing investors. Most countries’ pensions rely on an increasing amount of working age inhabitants to pay retirees and are now having issues paying out pensions due to the shift in demographics, that’s why many countries have been increasing the retirement age recently.

            There are 2 solutions to this.

            1. Increasing birth rates, this option is not sustainable in the long term but is commonly preferred for reasons mentioned below.
            2. Migration. There are currently plenty of countries with a large working-age population and a weak economy. Letting those migrate would solve the demographic issue, but is political suicide.
            • LandedGentry
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 hours ago

              This is a fundamental misunderstanding of how these funds work.

              The goal is not to pay people with the money from new people paying into the pot. They invest the money and then the pot grows and that money is used to pay out. When the pot is not growing enough - whether because investments aren’t doing well enough, or you designed a you designed an bad system where people can withdraw from it for too long, or any other many possible issues - then yes you functionally end up dipping into the money given by new people, but this is not how it was designed to be used.

              You are acting like this is a one-to-one system where you just put money in, then you get money out later, and all of the money given out is 100% the money that people put in in the first place with no intention of growing that money or finding a sustainable way of disseminating it long-term.

              Mismanagement/poorly built systems are not the same as Ponzi schemes. Unless you think, I don’t know, US Social Security is also a Ponzi scheme?

              • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                48 minutes ago

                This is a fundamental misunderstanding of how these funds work.

                This misunderstanding is on your side. There is a method of funding pensions refered to as pay as you go (PAYG).

                The goal is not to pay people with the money from new people paying into the pot.

                This is exactly how many unfunded, state sponsored pension schemes function. No pot of money exists. Only the ability to collect taxes.

                They invest the money and then the pot grows and that money is used to pay out.

                This is true for private pension schemes run by companies and individual pension schemes. Funded pension schemes are (usually) not ponzis.

              • xavier666@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Mismanagement/poorly built systems are not the same as Ponzi schemes

                “Tell me the difference between stupid and illegal and I’ll have my wife’s brother arrested”

              • qaz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 hours ago

                Of course I understand that the money that is put in is invested, but that doesn’t mean the problem goes away when the system relies on the “pot” growing at a certain rate.

                EDIT:

                Mismanagement/poorly built systems are not the same as Ponzi schemes. Unless you think, I don’t know, US Social Security is also a Ponzi scheme?

                I’m not implying that it’s the same, just that the comparison fits better than you might expect.

                • LandedGentry
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 hours ago

                  When did I ever say the problem goes away? I am saying it is not a Ponzi scheme. You were saying it is a Ponzi scheme. Don’t move the goalposts here.