Summary

France’s Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor, its most powerful at 1,600 MW, was connected to the grid on December 21 after 17 years of construction plagued by delays and budget overruns.

The European Pressurized Reactor (EPR), designed to boost nuclear energy post-Chernobyl, is 12 years behind schedule and cost €13.2 billion, quadruple initial estimates.

President Macron hailed the launch as a key step for low-carbon energy and energy security.

Nuclear power, which supplies 60% of France’s electricity, is central to Macron’s plan for a “nuclear renaissance.”

  • DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Some anti nuclear groups do everything they can to slow down nuclear builds, putting as many road blocks in the way as possible. Then when it’s slow they say: see, building nuclear plants is slow!

        • Akasazh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          The only miscalculation of the cost by -four times- was due to protest of anti nuclear protestors, according to you?

          Source pls?

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            If you are paid $1 an hour and it takes 6 hours that is $6

            If you work 12 hours that is $12

            12>6

            The problem with nuclear is that as a bombing target it has a greater impact than a solar farm. Having said that it was once a goal for every Canadian to have a reactor in their basement

            • Akasazh@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I was reacting to what /u/DaviddoesLemmy and /u/ryedaft were saying.

              You need to take the two parent posts in consideration for my argument.

              • DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Are you suggesting that delays don’t impact the cost? Or that the impact of those delays doesn’t account for the 4x budget overrun?

                I think it’s only one factor in the budget overrun, but still worth mentioning.

                • Akasazh@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  I’m not saying that. But saying that the only cause the project went over budget was over those protests is equally ridiculous, no?

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Politics are part of the system though. But if strategic supply of oil, gas, coal from undemocratic regimes was simply off the table, constitutionally forbidden and all that, I think nuclear energy would suddenly become more competitive. Because the financing of such groups would suffer.