Summary
A federal judge struck down key parts of an Arkansas law (Act 372) that would have allowed criminal charges against librarians and booksellers for providing “harmful” materials to minors, deeming them unconstitutional.
The law, signed by Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders in 2023, sought to relocate challenged library materials to restricted areas but faced opposition from groups like the ACLU, citing censorship concerns.
Supporters argue the law protects children from obscene content, and the state plans to appeal.
Similar restrictive book laws have been passed in other conservative states.
When I tell people one of the reasons we’re taking advantage of my dual nationality and emigrating is that my wife is a librarian, they think it’s a joke.
It’s not a fucking joke.
I will put money on SCOTUS reversing this and making it legal to arrest librarians for corrupting the youth.
Some states give librarians the authority to issue arrest warrants if the value of overdue books is over a certain amount. Just saying.
So you’re saying this is just fair play? Really?
FYI: My wife’s library doesn’t even have overdue fines. We’re in Indiana where she can already be arrested for allowing minors to access certain information deemed unsuitable.
Obviously not, but turnabout is fair play. You don’t have to have active fines. Just find one of these book banners and send them a demand letter, if they don’t return (book that is definitely worth over x amount) the librarian can issue an arrest warrant. If your wife happens to be wrong, well, qualified immunity bithces.
This is something they love to do. Pass a law they know is unconstitutional and then use the power of the state to fight for it. The Left has to waste money they could be spending on political campaigns while the taxpayers foot the legal expenses. And they get to crow about ‘activist’ judges undermining the will of the people.
It’s worse than that. Their goal is to throw the legal equivalent to spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks. Sometimes they get lucky and then you have a brick to add to historical precedence.
Hell, the age verification porn law is seen as unconstitutional but it’s held on.
Any reason the Dems are not doing the same?
My completely unqualified answer would be a combination of two things.
The first is that it’s often a lot easier to “say no” and be destructive/restrictive than it is to be constructive, thoughtful, intentional, and inclusive. The second is that the system of checks are out of balance and skewed towards Republicans even if the demographics of the US population as a whole don’t reflect that.
The second is that Republicans control more of government at a state and local level in addition to having a majority in the highest branch of the judiciary. Therefore they not only have the ability to pump out more laws, they also have a higher probability of one of those bat shit laws being upheld.
I can provide a bit more of a qualified answer, backed up by my own observations and my research into running for office as well as my research in elections. It became an obsession after the 2020 election. With that in mind, take this with a grain of salt.
The TL;DR of the below: Democrats fall in love and Republicans Fall in Line
Broadly speaking, the people who consistently vote for Republicans and the people who vote for Democrats (i.e. their respective base) are very different. The Republican base favors control and order whereas the Democrat base favors cooperation and liberty.
Because of this, Republican politicians can get away with shit laws that are oppressive, that restrict rights, and basically allow people to be shitty to people who are different (read: white, cis, hetro people can be assholes to non-white, trans, non-hetro people). Even the most moderate Republican voter who is open-minded will still vote Republican because being “nice” is not a higher value than “order”. So even though Marjorie Taylor Greene or Donald Fucking Trump are complete assholes, because they write laws that protect them, they don’t have enough motivation to not vote for a Republican.
Contrast this with the Democratic base. For a moment, assume that Donald Trump, is just as disgusting, just as racist, just as misogynistic, but consistently voted progressively. You (assuming you are on the liberal side of the spectrum) would probably either not vote for him or actively vote against him. The Democrat base is also very large in that there are a lot of pockets of people who tend to vote Democrat, but only if you speak to their specific issue.
That’s why Democratic candidates often have to run a very tight, very structured, and near perfect campaign whereas Republicans can literally take a candidate who’s never been to a donut shop and have a gaff of him ordering a box of “whatever makes sense”.
While Republicans have a consistent base that votes, Democrats do not. Democrats have to win the “middle”, i.e. people who aren’t politically engaged and these people often fall into three categories:
- people who are just busy either with life, family, school, etc.
- people who feel their vote doesn’t matter
- people who “don’t like politics” and sees “both sides as the same”
There is a common denominator of these people: they are often privileged and have never been on the sharp end of a government action and don’t think it will happen to them. So campaigns have to spend time to try to convince them that it’s worth voting for them.
So, to answer your question as to why Democrats can’t just give zero fucks: they literally can’t do that and win elections. Democrats can’t keep their base if they do.
Also, the Left needs to convince diverse groups to work together. All the Right has to do is come up with a phrase like “Make America Great Again” and it can pull in lots of people. That’s why Trump stole the phrase from Reagan.
Different mind sets. The Dems want government to work. They saw the New Deal raise millions out of poverty and want to bring it back. The GOP saw the New Deal bring millions out of poverty and it made them want to destroy government.
They saw the New Deal raise millions out of poverty and want to bring it back.
I’m not so sure about that
Actually getting the law in place is gravy.
Look at overturning Roe V. Wade. That energized a lot of Dems.
Up the ladder it goes, then. Unfortunately, the ladder ends in a fascist-majority Supreme Court.
So its ok when there in porn in a google advert?
