I digged out my dad’s old business laptop from 2006. This Asus rust is almost as old as me. But it booted up a horribly slow Windows 7 Home Premium that is totally unusable. Takes 30-40 minutes to open Chrome. Here are the specs: 40 gb old hard drive that is suprisingly healthy (96℅ according to HDDsentinel, more than 1000 days left) 1.73 ghz Intel Celeron M single core cpu that wasn’t exactly the fastest even in 2006 1.25 gb of terribly slow RAM American Megatrends BIOS from 2006 I know Linux can’t do miracles, but are there any still supported distro i could install that would actually run better than this shitty windows stuff?

I found puppy slitaz antix tahrpup ArchBang Slax Delicate Damn Small Linux Absolute FunOS LegacyOS exe gnu/linux Do you know others? Or from these which you recommend if my goal is to create a relatively useable, faster computer, preferably while it doesn’t look that awful (the desktop or wm). So usability>speed>looks But all these are very important, just in this order. Also recommend a desktop enviroment or a window manager that runs well, but doesn’t look that awful and can be installed on these distros

  • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    SATA started rolling out in drive around 2003/2004, it’s possible. My 08 laptop had a Sata ssd.

    Just throw Arch/ Alpine on it with sway. If you need a full DE, LXQT is pretty light weight but even plasma is not too expensive tbh.

    • kekmacskaOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      i’d rather burn it than install ANY kde on that. Arch can get into consideration, maybe. Alpine not because i don’t hate myself enough to use non-gnu linux. This is a 2006 laptop, and not a high-end one. 40 gb hdd. I’m sure as hell it isn’t sata. Sata only started appearing around 2010 in systems that were affordable for a mortal human

      • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        SATA was definitely around before 2010 in consumer hardware. Nonetheless, Alpine is a great distribution and gnu software is packaged for it and freely available. I believe it is busybox by default.

        It is musl, but in my experience that’s not much of an issue.

        Have you had problems with KDE in the past? I typically use i3 but the QT framework is great.

        • kekmacskaOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          kde is not a problem on high-end hardware. But recommending for this laptop is batshit insane. The fact that you use i3 explains a lot. That’s much more lightweight than kde

      • michael_palmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        What’s wrong with non-GNU Linux? I’m using Alpine with Gnome DE on my old laptop (3rd generation Core i3, 4GB RAM). It feels much faster than Linux Mint Cinnamon.

        • kekmacskaOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          extremely hard to use. I could install netBSD and Arch, used Tumbleweed, but any non-gnu Linux is beyond me