Elon Musk published a controversial guest opinion piece supporting the far-right AfD for the prominent Welt am Sonntag newspaper, prompting the commentary editor to resign.

  • subignition@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    7 days ago

    probably an, “I didn’t want this published, but was overruled by the powers that be, and don’t want it to look like I endorse or approve of this horseshit” situation

    • gencha@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      She was the commentary editor, not the one responsible for the piece.

      • subignition@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        7 days ago

        The article states that she was the editor for the opinion section… this was published in the opinion section… I think it’s still reasonable to conclude that she attempted to stop it from being published, even if she was not the person with the final say

        • Itisreallyboring@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          7 days ago

          The publication of the article was enforced by Mathias Döpfner, who is the CEO of Axel Springer, which owns “Die Welt”. There is a lot of damage control ongoing at “Die Welt” at the moment, with opinion pieces and comments by some editors, why this article was a mistake.

          Nevertheless, still a very shitty rightwing newspaper.

          There is also a rumour in circulation that Döpfner motivated Musk to buy Twitter in the past…

        • gencha@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          There is zero reason for such conclusions. You could just read her statement

          • subignition@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            I did read her statement. Do you have an alternative inference that you think is more reasonable?