Can anyone succinctly explain communism? Everything I’ve read in the past said that the state owns the means of production and in practice (in real life) that seems to be the reality. However I encountered a random idiot on the Internet that claimed in communism, there is no state and it is a stateless society. I immediately rejected this idea because it was counter to what I knew about communism irl. In searching using these keywords, I came across the ideas that in communism, it does strive to be a stateless society. So which one is it? If it’s supposed to be a stateless society, why are all real-life forms of communism authoritarian in nature?

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not necessarily, this is extremely oversimplified.

      First, Marxists advocate for building Dual Power, ie an existing “second government” to take the place of the first.

      Second, Humans don’t “crave power.” Humans work towards their own self-interest, but this alone doesn’t translate to “power.”

      • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Advocate. Its a nice sediment. But in reality a strongman will fill that vacuum. Always has, always will.

        Let’s substitute the word power for dominion. The “ideal” human doesn’t want power or dominion, but you and I don’t live in that world. People in every nation on this Earth have a presiding desire for control; control nature, control the elements, control others. Everywhere humans want control over others.

        It may not be the way we want it to be, but it is how it is.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          No, what you say isn’t true at all, nor are you speaking in real terms but vibes. You’re historically wrong and sociologically wrong.