Trump’s return to the White House with an enduring number of loyalists in Congress underscores just how politically trivial the ‘election denier’ label has become.
Trump’s return to the White House with an enduring number of loyalists in Congress underscores just how politically trivial the ‘election denier’ label has become.
But there are facts to back them up?
I think nobody debating knows either way unless one takes the official counts at face value.
In a regular democracy, like most of Europe, this is easy, the counts are publicly vetted by all the candidates or their representatives beforehand.
Here in America this is done differently. The majority of the votes in many states are announced to everyone at the same time including the candidates. Nobody can say “here is a proof I can understand so the vote is ok”. We have to trust several private companies without verification or understanding how they did it. Nor do we use secondary verification in many places
So it’s a matter of faith. It you trust, really trust all these private software companies to get it right and not be compromised or corrupt . Then that is the end of the conversation.
If you don’t trust them I’d think they have ulterior motives that is another thing.
But again, who knows? Which is why doubt has been able to exist here