After months of getting close, the relationship between Trump and his so-called ‘first buddy’ has become ‘fraught,’ according to a New York Times reporter
It isn’t tolerating misogyny, it’s pointing out misogyny and ridiculing misogynists.
It’s OK if you don’t like how that’s being done, and it’s OK if you can’t understand the nuance but policing my speech unchallenged is not what is going to happen.
I think I got the nuance behind ‘bigoted man I disagree with is actually a woman because women amirite?’.
I’m trans, and like actually hate these people, they deserve ridicule. However, if I’m willing to tolerate bigotry on my behalf towards people that are in some out-group, there’s no guarantee that some day I won’t be among that out-group and subsequently targeted by that type of bigotry. Do you understand the issue I’m raising?
I can’t tolerate people misgendering Caitlen Jenner or Blair white because while they suck, it only contributes to an environment where that type of insult is then considered acceptable.
You’re kinda proving you could understand what the joke is if you wanted to, you just refuse to acknowledge it could be anything but your first thought about it.
So you’re schizophrenic also? There’s literally nothing this could be based on. However in actual reality, I remember you repeatedly and weirdly defending that troll piece of shit UniversalMonk, so I’m not surprised.
Oh woah I said a couple troll dickheads “sucked off” conservative twats. Clearly I meant it literally!
No one is going to buy that you cannot understand that language just like no one buys that you cannot understand the joke ITT. It’s clear you are intentionally lying when act like you don’t understand these things
you don’t seem like you handle people disagreeing with you well. you’ve already called me schizophrenic because I had an issue with your history of homophobic comments, only to be like “well they’re people I don’t like politiclly so it’s okay”
that was my original point, so thank you for demonstrating the behavior I guess
Kind of hilarious to make a comment such as “you don’t handle disagreement well” right after you demonstrated the way you handle it is stalking and cryptic accusations because your stalking led you to knowing someone used completely run of the mill English insults against pricks.(Fucking creepy btw)
You’re here proving the point that it’s insufferable to talk to someone whose whole MO is waiting for language they can pretend makes others worse people than them. And once again, you are a Universalmonk defender and that sorta speaks for itself. Because of people with his pathetic lack of grasp on logic, we now have trump. Great job defending all of that. But I’m sure you can find something about this comment, my use of the word “prick” or something else in my history that supposedly makes me scum though, so knock yourself out. I hope it makes you feel better about yourself.
I think I got the nuance behind ‘bigoted man I disagree with is actually a woman because women amirite?’.
Nope.
It goes like this: ‘bigoted man is bigoted because this will aggravate his orange tits. If bigoted man was not bigoted it would not be possible to rip on him like this.’
Put another way: ‘I am a bigot, said John.’
If that doesn’t clarify it then I’m out of patience to explain further.
It isn’t tolerating misogyny, it’s pointing out misogyny and ridiculing misogynists.
It’s OK if you don’t like how that’s being done, and it’s OK if you can’t understand the nuance but policing my speech unchallenged is not what is going to happen.
I think I got the nuance behind ‘bigoted man I disagree with is actually a woman because women amirite?’.
I’m trans, and like actually hate these people, they deserve ridicule. However, if I’m willing to tolerate bigotry on my behalf towards people that are in some out-group, there’s no guarantee that some day I won’t be among that out-group and subsequently targeted by that type of bigotry. Do you understand the issue I’m raising?
I can’t tolerate people misgendering Caitlen Jenner or Blair white because while they suck, it only contributes to an environment where that type of insult is then considered acceptable.
You’re kinda proving you could understand what the joke is if you wanted to, you just refuse to acknowledge it could be anything but your first thought about it.
You’re the type to get weirdly sexual and homophobic when it’s people you disagree with. Not really interested in what you have to say tbh.
So you’re schizophrenic also? There’s literally nothing this could be based on. However in actual reality, I remember you repeatedly and weirdly defending that troll piece of shit UniversalMonk, so I’m not surprised.
Oh woah I said a couple troll dickheads “sucked off” conservative twats. Clearly I meant it literally!
No one is going to buy that you cannot understand that language just like no one buys that you cannot understand the joke ITT. It’s clear you are intentionally lying when act like you don’t understand these things
you don’t seem like you handle people disagreeing with you well. you’ve already called me schizophrenic because I had an issue with your history of homophobic comments, only to be like “well they’re people I don’t like politiclly so it’s okay”
that was my original point, so thank you for demonstrating the behavior I guess
Kind of hilarious to make a comment such as “you don’t handle disagreement well” right after you demonstrated the way you handle it is stalking and cryptic accusations because your stalking led you to knowing someone used completely run of the mill English insults against pricks.(Fucking creepy btw)
You’re here proving the point that it’s insufferable to talk to someone whose whole MO is waiting for language they can pretend makes others worse people than them. And once again, you are a Universalmonk defender and that sorta speaks for itself. Because of people with his pathetic lack of grasp on logic, we now have trump. Great job defending all of that. But I’m sure you can find something about this comment, my use of the word “prick” or something else in my history that supposedly makes me scum though, so knock yourself out. I hope it makes you feel better about yourself.
Nope.
It goes like this: ‘bigoted man is bigoted because this will aggravate his orange tits. If bigoted man was not bigoted it would not be possible to rip on him like this.’
Put another way: ‘I am a bigot, said John.’
If that doesn’t clarify it then I’m out of patience to explain further.
That’s cool I don’t need any more explanations.