• CountVon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      The UK did claim Canada, along with most of North America, in the Royal Proclamation of 1763. Canada was granted progressively more autonomy over time but the UK still maintained ultimate sovereignty until the Canadian constitution was patriated. The UK effectively ceded its sovereignty over Canada when UK parliament passed the Canada Act 1982.

      Denmark granted Greenland autonomy with the 2009 Act on Greenland Self-Government, but Denmark still maintains the authority to modify Greenland’s constitutional arrangement. So, much like the UK still held sovereignty over Canada prior to 1982, Denmark still holds sovereignty over Greenland. Apparently there have been some efforts to draft a constitution for Greenland, but that has not been passed into law by Greenland’s lawmakers nor has it been patriated by Denmark.

      • rumba
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        This makes sense. I completely understand this thank you.

    • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Ooohhh.

      I did not realize until this moment that I didn’t understand their relationship correctly.

      • AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It’s not the same as the UK-Canada relationship either though, because the UK isn’t responsible for Canada’s defence and foreign policy.

    • Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yes, but mostly because it’s a rock in the middle of the ocean, albeit a really big one.

      Don’t touch our rock collection.