• grillme
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      IMO to limit gas/diesel prices and reduce inflation in advance of US elections. Now it is someone else’s problem.

      • credo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        You also have to consider the impacts to the other countries who would comply with these sanctions. You need time for them to change or the impact will be too severe, and they will just ignore them.

        This takes political and economic capital. If the US were to move too quickly- esp in something where other countries obviously don’t have the same motivation to act, they could just tell the US to piss off and form their own economic system- without the US in the lead. This is a matter of calculating which option causes the least burden for those countries along with a bit of a gamble.

    • Wilshire@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s been a game of whack-a-mole sanctioning Russia’s shadow fleet of oil tankers.

      • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        In this particular case, I don’t think it was money per se. More like being overly cautious with rules to implement aggressive price floors for russian oil.

        And the generally failed policy of “escalation management”.