Literally the headline. Not illegal at all is best of course.
I’d like to have a sort of reverse Warrant Canary of sorts, that will pop if security is breached
Literally the headline. Not illegal at all is best of course.
I’d like to have a sort of reverse Warrant Canary of sorts, that will pop if security is breached
The least illegal thing? Reminds me of the criticisms I got because people thought I drew Muhammad (disclaimer, she was a moblin and she just happened to be named Muhammad which I did for the rep, and drawing Muhammad isn’t even an actual doctrinal prohibition, it’s one of those anachronisms like the LDS church prohibiting drinking coke,
no it’s pepsi we don’t drink).First, it didn’t get taken down so I’m not sure why you shared this. Secondly, this definitely appears to be a troll post so yeah people usually don’t like being trolled. I’m not sure why you’re acting surprised.
Edit: ignore me, I’m ignorant of the ways of twitter.
It was marked as invisible by those in charge (except for those who can go right to it) and was the sole reason images are not coded into the top right of pages anymore. But the original question about the most non-illegal ways to trigger the censors brought the incident to mind. It’s certainly not “illegal”, in fact it’s protected by the rights most nations have, yet it causes a lot of different reactions. Of note, even the series the character was inspired by could be said to have this going for it, albeit with a few differences. I drew her as a homage to people we had been talking/arguing about (there were a lot of people wishing death on each other at the time due to the current war being fresh), and I wasn’t actually anticipating it would be necessarily interpreted as actually drawing a certain historical figure.
Oh, sorry I don’t understand how censorship works on Twitter I guess.