User growth is ‘stagnant’ on the platform formerly known as Twitter.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    2 days ago

    overpay (by a lot) for the company.

    a bazillion stupid-ass decisions.

    chase users away.

    chase advertisers away.

    the stupid rebranding.

    can’t make money. :::shocker:::

    the ‘richest’ guy in the world whining about not making more. fuck off, old spice.

    • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      2 days ago

      You could also argue the price was worth the political influence it has given him. Probably made more money in other areas due to owning it.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 days ago

        definitely, getting tangled in politics and buying the white house definitely paid for twitter.

      • Delphia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        He didnt buy twitter to own it, he bought twitter to destroy it. Gradually scattering the users onto their respective echo chamber platforms and controling the mainstream narrative as they do so.

      • OpenStars@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        That won’t stop him from lording it over and blaming his subordinates as if it were personally their faults.