TehBamski@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 天前What app is so useful, you can’t believe it’s free?message-squaremessage-square429fedilinkarrow-up1546arrow-down110
arrow-up1536arrow-down1message-squareWhat app is so useful, you can’t believe it’s free?TehBamski@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 天前message-square429fedilink
minus-squareFlax@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up58arrow-down1·edit-23 天前Wikipedia. Not an app but still deserves a mention.
minus-squarepeetabix@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 天前I’d say the same about archive.org too.
minus-squareLetsdothis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down13·3 天前Wikipedia is free because it’s wrong a lot. People pay for facts, not opinion. When it comes to “news.” Well… that’s not true exactly… Besides… innit like 1 guy runnin’ all o’ Wikipedia?
minus-squarebss03@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 天前Wikipedia is as accurate as printed encyclopedias, in at least one study. The Wikimedia Foundation only has one CEO, but many members, and Wikipedia has tens of thousands of contributiors that are not foundation members.
Wikipedia. Not an app but still deserves a mention.
I’d say the same about archive.org too.
Wikipedia is free because it’s wrong a lot.
People pay for facts, not opinion. When it comes to “news.”
Well… that’s not true exactly…
Besides… innit like 1 guy runnin’ all o’ Wikipedia?
Wikipedia is as accurate as printed encyclopedias, in at least one study.
The Wikimedia Foundation only has one CEO, but many members, and Wikipedia has tens of thousands of contributiors that are not foundation members.