Since it aligns with the interests of the oligarchy in at least two different ways - the promotion of narrow religious orthodoxy to foster subservience and homogeneity, and the “privatization” of public services to funnel more wealth into fewer private hands (and particularly to create more sources for bribes and kickbacks for officials) - I’d say the only real question one might have about this ruling is the purely academic one of what particular specious arguments the corrupt majority will use to colorably justify inevitably ruling in favor of killing church/state separation.
Since it aligns with the interests of the oligarchy in at least two different ways - the promotion of narrow religious orthodoxy to foster subservience and homogeneity, and the “privatization” of public services to funnel more wealth into fewer private hands (and particularly to create more sources for bribes and kickbacks for officials) - I’d say the only real question one might have about this ruling is the purely academic one of what particular specious arguments the corrupt majority will use to colorably justify inevitably ruling in favor of killing church/state separation.