- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/6832295
My eyes are bleeding
Black text on a red background: famous for being highly legible
Surprisingly the eyebleeding red text has kept the ultras away
Can you list the sources? I can’t read them
Really hard to read - I OCR’d it and it looks about right, but I can’t guarantee:
- Property Law of the People’s Republic of China, Chapter V (http://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/englishnpc/Law/2009-02/20/content_1471118.htm)
- Economic performance of national state-owned and state-holding enterprises from January to December 2023 (https://zcgls.mof.gov.cn/qiyeyunxingdongtai/202401/t20240129_3927581.htm)
- SOE reforms key to smooth recovery, ChinaDaily (https://archive.ph/44ZmP#selection-403.68-403.79)
- Taking China’s pulse, The Harvard Gazette (https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2020/07/long-term-survey-reveals-chinese-government-satisfaction/)
- Five-year plans, China finance and their consequences, China Journal of Accounting Research (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2017.06.001)
- “China Executes 14 Billionaires in 8 Years, Culture News Reports”, Bloomberg (https://archive.is/4J6eh)
- Grasp the Large, Let Go of the Small: The Transformation of the State Sector in China, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2015a_hsieh.pdf)
- Liberalization in Reverse, Heritage Foundation (https://www.heritage.org/global-politics/commentary/liberalization-reverse)
Thank you for this!
I was curious about the 95.5% support and read that source, then stopped when they started cherry picking numbers to push a narrative (citing low % of “very satisfied” vs grouping both “somewhat” and “very”). This was used to say that township-level support was low in China vs high in the US.
Looking at the actual study, overall township-level satisfaction is 70%… which is exactly the support level that they cite for the US.