https://sh.itjust.works/post/31716642

Edit: There used to be a screenshot here. I messed up the link in an edit and don’t have a local copy saved.

My comment was roughly 'It already looks like it might be better than things now, at least Biden never advocated for full displacement of all Palestine."

I had already seen half the comment section of the post with ban marks. This single comment copped me a fully-expected permaban. Unfortunately my comment doesn’t show up in modlogs so I had to retype it more or less from memory.

The bloodshed:

Screenshot edited as per mod request.

Most of the banned comments are actually still visible. If you browse the thread you’ll notice there’s nothing particularly inflammatory or banworthy about any of them.

Best part, in the middle of all that banning, our buddy found the time to mod the one guy in that post who supported his opinions. Welp, another echo chamber in the making.


Follow up:

The mod posted in a similar post in this comm. FWIW, while I stand by my actions and opinion, I did msg them to offer them a personal apology.

  • spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Your own (accurate) words:

    “Thanks, you make some good points. There’s certainly room for improvement. In this case, I wasn’t making fun of anybody, but I agree I could have sugar-coated it a bit more.”

    This is exactly what I mean—if you recognize room for improvement, acting on that is key.

    As for your hypotheticals, yes, I understand they’re just ideas. The issue is when those hypotheticals lead to behaviors that derail conversations or disrupt the community. That’s where the problem arises—it’s not about whether bad actors might exist, but about avoiding actions that create unnecessary friction or suspicion in the absence of evidence.

    If you’re mindful of this going forward, I think you’ll have a much better chance of staying unbanned and contributing constructively.