Head to https://squarespace.com/thelinuxexperiment to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code thelinuxexperiment Grab a brand new laptop or desktop running Linux: https:/...
But it doesn’t change how FOSS networks […] are very leftist.
FOSS is essentially software socialism. It’s not surprising many of the people who love it espouse those ideals in other aspects of life.
Idk about that
Yes you do. I can see your post history on the topic. You know they’ve been censoring opposing viewpoints.
but they’re at least claiming to be removing censorship so let’s see how it goes
Claiming to be doing that then verifiably censoring political persuasions they don’t adhere to. Clearly following the Elon Musk school of being free speech absolutists.
(not too well so far)
Well at least you’re aware of it.
Hostile? Exaggerated in my opinion.
Well facts don’t really line up with your opinions, I guess. They were and are being hostile to LGBT people.
I support letting anti-LGBT and other anti- people speak in a not toxic way
Ummm… How? Legitimately how is that possible? Being anti-LGBT is inherently being toxic. What does that even mean?
It’s an impossible position. You cannot be anti-LGBT without being toxic in the same way you cannot jump into a pool of lava unscathed.
And you say they can deal with people who think differently?
Not really
But you initially said they could?
but this is how FOSS networks (Revolt and Lemmy in particular) made me be so like I’m not sure who’s at fault here and it’s not really the topic anyways.
Of course. You’re not at fault. Nothing is your fault. It’s those damn other people who made you this way.
You lost on every single point made, then proudly silenced your opponent and strutted victoriously, while calling them stubborn… some people have no ability to self analyze, genuinely impressive display of willful ignorance
Are you really, completely sure that you are not the one being stubborn here?
I am stubborn too but there’s no point in talking to a stubborn person with an opposite opinion. The only thing it can cause is both sides being convinced that the other side is stupid.
Can you give me an example of non-toxic anti-lgbtq behavior?
Religion. That’s like the most obvious example possible.
Because you didn’t make a point, you indicated that religious people can be non-toxically anti-lgbtq without giving an example of them being non-toxically lgbtq
I deny that it’s possible to be non-toxically anti-lgbtq because being against someone simply for existing and being themselves is inherently toxic.
As is being against the right to freedom of expression.
Furthermore you didn’t even give an example you just vaguely handwaved at religion.
Perhaps you’re right. There’s no point talking to a hateful bigot for me either.
And for what it’s worth, you don’t need to tell me about your right to do that. You can either simply not reply, or you can block. You don’t need my consent.
FOSS is essentially software socialism. It’s not surprising many of the people who love it espouse those ideals in other aspects of life.
Yes you do. I can see your post history on the topic. You know they’ve been censoring opposing viewpoints.
Claiming to be doing that then verifiably censoring political persuasions they don’t adhere to. Clearly following the Elon Musk school of being free speech absolutists.
Well at least you’re aware of it.
Well facts don’t really line up with your opinions, I guess. They were and are being hostile to LGBT people.
Ummm… How? Legitimately how is that possible? Being anti-LGBT is inherently being toxic. What does that even mean?
It’s an impossible position. You cannot be anti-LGBT without being toxic in the same way you cannot jump into a pool of lava unscathed.
But you initially said they could?
Of course. You’re not at fault. Nothing is your fault. It’s those damn other people who made you this way.
I think there’s no point in any further discussion with such stubbornness. I would like to use my right to prohibit interaction with me any further.
You lost on every single point made, then proudly silenced your opponent and strutted victoriously, while calling them stubborn… some people have no ability to self analyze, genuinely impressive display of willful ignorance
They were extremely stubborn though. They are one of the “you agree or you’re toxic” fascists.
Are you really, completely sure that you are not the one being stubborn here?
Can you give me an example of non-toxic anti-lgbtq behavior?
I am stubborn too but there’s no point in talking to a stubborn person with an opposite opinion. The only thing it can cause is both sides being convinced that the other side is stupid.
Religion. That’s like the most obvious example possible.
That makes no sense at all, the parts of religion that are anti lgbtq ARE toxic…
Are you against gay marriage on religious grounds? Are you against trans people on religious grounds? that’s obviously toxic.
Furthermore it’s fully possible to be religious and not anti-lgbtq… correct?
so that isn’t really an example. Give me like, something someone would say that’s anti-lgbtq and non-toxic, an example quote?
For you everything anti-lgbt is toxic and for me everything about lgbt is toxic. Any questions?
That’s not really true btw but like how is that different to your point?
Because you didn’t make a point, you indicated that religious people can be non-toxically anti-lgbtq without giving an example of them being non-toxically lgbtq
I deny that it’s possible to be non-toxically anti-lgbtq because being against someone simply for existing and being themselves is inherently toxic.
As is being against the right to freedom of expression.
Furthermore you didn’t even give an example you just vaguely handwaved at religion.
Perhaps you’re right. There’s no point talking to a hateful bigot for me either.
And for what it’s worth, you don’t need to tell me about your right to do that. You can either simply not reply, or you can block. You don’t need my consent.