• DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That and he could get $41 / bushel instead of the $17 that was in the contract.

    Edit: let my flesh is this out a little more.

    In my opinion, he was trying to back out of the contract and thought he could based on a technicality. That he didn’t physically sign it. But he didn’t physically sign the others and still accepted and delivered those.

    • guyman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      So? Even if he did work before, he didn’t sign a contract. He should be free to change any deals that don’t have a notorized signature attached to them.

      This is basic business. Hopefully he won’t get convicted and future businessmen can learn from this.

      • PieMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Contract law is interesting here. There’s something called implied consent that makes the previous events very relevant - “Implied acceptance occurs when the parties act in a way that indicates their agreement with the contract terms. It also occurs when a product or service is purchased; payment for the item in question is considered implied acceptance.”. This can be verbal or nonverbal.

        So since he acted in a way that indicated acceptance previously, the form of acceptance (single text, positive reaction) it’s implied he was accepting. A hand shake also constitutes acceptance if it was face to face.