• CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    Gabe Newell has a net worth of $9.5 billion and there is no such thing as an ethical billionaire. Steam is great and as long as the company behaves well there’s no reason not to use it, but billionaires are not your friends.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      They are some rare cases where someone becomes a billionaire because something suddenly took off.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Sort of agree but look how much he’s done for Linux gaming. Also the steam deck was well thought out and designed to be user serviceable.

      • index@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Sort of agree but look how much he’s done for Linux gaming.

        Let’s not forget that Steam is a proprietary third party launcher that doesn’t share any values with linux. Valve built the apple store of videogames, while they are now moving in a better direction keep in mind that they are part of the problem.

        • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Sort of agree still. Steam deck is a great example. They built it to be user serviceable, and you can literally switch to the Linux desktop and use root, and reinstall your OS if you want. It’s not locked down crazy like other systems. Remember the PS3 other os? Didn’t even get graphics drivers, then they ultimately removed it when it was used to jailbreak it.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        Was that all Gabe? Or was that people at Valve who had the ideas and executed the ideas and Gabe is given credit for?

        • Natanael@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          “yes”? He’s definitely not building any significant fraction himself, but if he didn’t care for these things he wouldn’t let the company put so much resources into them.

          Credit for the things built goes to the people building them. Credit for it being possible to build goes to the people who founded and funded the teams