My attempts to come up with what this misogynistic creep would consider a “friendly superintelligence” keep resembling Elliot Rodger’s pre-shooting manifesto.

I also noticed the “.eth” crypto name drop. :agony-4horsemen:

  • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    i mean, i’m assuming an AI wouldnt have robotics at its disposal at first. it seems to me it would just exploit a bunch of security vulnerabilities and take .1% of your processing power to contribute to its own intelligence. AI generally are designed with a use case in mind so its not unlikely that a hyperintelligent AI that somehow developed would still be prone to doing stuff in its core programming. which if we were designing a hyperintelligent AI i assume it would be for data modelling extremely complex stuff like weather systems (or on a darker note, surveillance)

    honestly i just think its weird that we’d just happen to accidentally design something hyperintelligent. i think its more likely that we’ll design something stupid with a literal rat brain and it might fuck some shit up. rat cyborg that somehow creates a virus that destroys everything so that the hardware will give it more orgasm juices

    • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Was Rokos Basilisk supposed to be hyperintelligent? I can’t remember. But yeah, humanity designing something that smart is up for debate too.

      Basically, Roko makes a lot of stupid assumptions and me no like