• neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    It doesn’t seem that this bill does that.

    I think it’s taking power from agencies like the fda and fcc. It doesn’t say anything about the courts.

    But I might not understand everything perfectly.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      That still reduces the executive to “just following orders” which is a principle that’s not accepted anywhere that follows the rule of law.

        • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Did it ever?

          America signed the Rome Statutes, but never ratified it, and eventually withdrew entirely. They wield “international law” like a whip, but don’t subscribe to it themselves. America is the epitome of rules for thee and none for me.

    • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Most of the judicial branch’s effective power comes from precedent: the court rules on one case, and that informs other officials’ interpretation of the law in similar circumstances going forward. This order seems to replace judicial precedent with the president’s opinion as the basis for interpreting the law outside the courts, with the court now only able to override that opinion on a case by case basis.