I played both betas/stress tests and the game just looks and feels like complete shit. Did it change at all since then?

I played on both PC and PS5. In my opinion the game looked really muddy and gross. Like MH rise looked better on switch. I know it’s monster hunter, the gameplay was fun(ish), kind of easy. Very hand holdy though. I do not want to drop $60/70 on this game if it’s exactly like it was in the beta’s.

  • h3adphones
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Looked through steam reviews a bit, looks like there are a lot of negative reviews related to performance. It’s currently sitting at Mixed reviews.

    • SolidShake@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yeah I plan on buying PS5 probably if I do because I expect it to be more optimized for consoles at first. Hmm maybe I’ll sit on this one for a while, maybe wait for a sale or something.

  • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    What’s your hardware?

    On high end hardware the game runs fine, not good but okish. On console they use FSR1 at a really low resolution, making everything look really blurry. On PC at least FSR3 is available for lower end hardware but don’t expect too much if you don’t have a Nvidia 4000+ or AMD 6000+ series card.

    Digital Foundry has performance videos for console and PC up already.

    • SolidShake@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I have a 3060 12gb OC edition, Ryzen 7 5800x3D, 32gb ram at 4200, and installed on an m.2 SSD.

      And I should expect much as the medium settings requirement is nvidia 2000 series… And DLSS also makes the game look like a shit sandwich even on quality.

      • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Playing on ultra on r7 7700 and 6750 ( 12GB ), 1080p and its running 43-60fps. They also released a high res texture pack but its recommended to only use with min 16GB of vram ( free dlc ) which i havent tested yet.

        So try the benchmark and see. I think the medium settings should be fine

        • SolidShake@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I only have 12gb of vram. I would be fine if the game ran on high with DLSS OFF and native 1080p at 60-80fps. But it just doesn’t, even though my PC should have 0 issues according to their spec requirements. I’ll wait for patches and sales I think. Or maybe a demo is a ailable? I haven’t looked.

          • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Is this from beta or benchmark tool? Big difference. I have framegen off because eeuw and play on 1080p

            • SolidShake@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              i tried the benchmark today. medium settings, native res i get 50fps average… im not playing this for a while lol. that’s insane for what is recommended vs what i have for specs. medium should be at least 80fps on my computer.

      • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        And DLSS also makes the game look like a shit sandwich even on quality.

        Correct, I’m on a 7900 XTX and was able to get the best experience on Ultra by using FSR only for anti aliasing (native resolution) and turning on FSR frame generation. There are still artifacts but they are not nearly as bad as with upscaling.

        Without frame gen I hover at around 60, good enough for controller but a pain with mouse.

        Still, your 3060 is most likely going to output a clearer image than what your PS5 can do with FSR1. Did you give the benchmark on PC a go?

          • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            Beta wasnt optimised at all and frame gen was broken in them which was funny, capcom said this was the case and is why we got 2 more betas hehe. Full game is better optimised but still has some hickups. Id suggest to run the benchmark, which is free and is a lot more updated than the betas ( and runs better )

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Depends on your hardware. I ran the benchmark tool for a laugh. I don’t think I quite meet minimum spec, but not far off I think. If you’re down that end, I’d avoid it.

    https://i.imgur.com/JR1YNxE.jpeg

    Lots of upscaling and frame generation options, which honestly make it look shite.

    • SolidShake@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      i am WELL abover recommended soec by a long shot. They should maybe reconsider those specs since not everyone wants to use fram gen and lower resolutiona in 2025.

  • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It’s a new game. Unfortunately I think we are now in an era where we can expect new games to run like shit on release, and be improved over the first year.