Actual universal healthcare advocates would see that the discourse Mangione brought into the public eye is good for awareness and involvement.
Anyone who sides with CEOs and claims to be a universal healthcare advocate is a scy-op. A system with universal healthcare wouldn’t need obscenely overpaid CEOs.
I guarantee you that nobody has become more informed as a result of this. And even if a few conservatives discovered their side was against public medical funding, and not by their side actually gutting public medical funding as we speak, it wouldn’t change the way they vote.
Also, the word is psy-op. The psy stands for psychological operation, not science operation.
Actual universal healthcare advocates would see that the discourse Mangione brought into the public eye is good for awareness and involvement.
Anyone who sides with CEOs and claims to be a universal healthcare advocate is a scy-op. A system with universal healthcare wouldn’t need obscenely overpaid CEOs.
I guarantee you that nobody has become more informed as a result of this. And even if a few conservatives discovered their side was against public medical funding, and not by their side actually gutting public medical funding as we speak, it wouldn’t change the way they vote.
Also, the word is psy-op. The psy stands for psychological operation, not science operation.
Thanks!