And yet, China is using AI.
…I… don’t know what to think about that.
…I really don’t.
Because it seems that AI is just a scam.
It may “exist” but what it can do is a scam.
Maybe China thinks we have to use it just to “keep up” with the Western powers, but I dunno.
Anyway, interesting discussion with Adam Conover and Ed Zitron. It’s long, but you can listen to it while doing other things. And the comments are interesting too, but then again, there are also trolls in the comments as well (AI supporters here and there).
Frankly, though? I oppose AI. I’m anti-AI. I’m anti-AI in China and anti-AI in America and anti-AI in the whole damn planet.
I wouldn’t say AI (or pattern-replicating models resembling AI) is flawed. It’s a great tool for saving time and automating certain processes.
The problem is the myriad of grifters who appeared, mostly in the West, trying to sell it as a cure-all snake oil.
For instance, there’s a massive push in the EU to insert AI in education, but with little regard or planning on how to do it effectively. It would be a great tool if we were to feed AI with our curriculi, then ask it to update it to current knowledge (e.g. in science), come up with suggestions for better delivery of certain topics, eliminate time wasted on erroneous, repeating, or useless topics and improve our schedules for other topics (e.g. teaching Romeo and Juliet in Languages, and at the same time go through the history of 1400s Venice in History). These things could be done using commitees over a 5 year period. Or they could be done by AI in a day. Instead though, we get to have handsomely-paid private contractors organize days-long training sessions over how to use AI to draw a picture, because it might make a presentation to students slightly more exciting.
Honestly even your idea of having an LLM “update” a curriculum just makes me annoyed. Why does everyone automatically give authority to an LLM on perhaps one of the most important societal functions, instead of trusting teachers to do their job, with the decades of experience that they have in teaching?
Is this what we want? AI generated slop for teaching the next generation because it’ll get it done in a day?