Critics said the new terms implied Mozilla was asking users for the rights to whatever data they input or upload through Firefox.
It was pretty damn horrible communication but I never believed Mozilla would go into full on data brokering business.
That wasn’t the point. The point was that the terms as written would allow them to.
No it wouldn’t. For fucks sake, are you a lawyer? Can you read legal definitions?
I don’t need to read legal stuff because we don’t need a ToS: I don’t need one, Firefox doesn’t need one, Mozilla doesn’t need one for Firefox. So, why?
I literally can’t think of a single person at Mozilla who would benefit from that situation more than from the status quo.
California doing California things.
First, most items I buy suddenly cause cancer. Now, Mozilla is suddenly Google.
Anti science bullshit maybe not the most welcome on this platform.
