• icerunner_origin@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Reading through the changes, they don’t reassure me. If Mozilla isn’t intending to monetize, modify or exploit my data in any way, then why do they think that they need any kind of a license for it? A piece of software I use for it’s intended purpose, to send information from my computer to a server and back, doesn’t need to seek a license to use that information.

  • heavydust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Call me when they remove it.

    Mozilla [is] asking for user data in order to operate Firefox

    I’m confused. Isn’t Firefox an autonomous application? Like it could be “programmed” to do stuff without asking Mozilla every time? Why am I not operating Firefox, why is it Mozilla?

    • stoy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah, that is what I feel is way too dishonest.

      Be upfront about it.

      "To offset some operating expenses, Mozilla will be collecting user data from Firefox users, this includes the following:

      • User input
      • User interactions
      • User up and downloads

      This data will be used to train AI computer models.

      To disable this feature, go into settings, click the User Data tab, under the Privacy title, untick

      Send user data to Mozilla."

      Bam, transparency.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          35 minutes ago

          Some people don’t care about that stuff, and it’s their right to be as private (or not) as they choose. They can’t make informed decisions, however, if companies don’t tell them what they’re doing with user data.

  • rosahaj@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m quite upset about how even our open source spaces are getting enshittified :( (besides mozilla’s previous problems) Honestly, I might just go back to qutebrowser

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      The unavoidable problem is that things cost money. Everything Mozilla does costs money, from hosting their website to paying developers. If they are giving away the software free to users, where is the money going to come from? Previously (and I think currently) a lot of that money is coming from Google, but being beholden to that one company is not ideal. So Mozilla has to look for alternate income.

      I can at least empathize with the shitty position they are in where they have to find a way to monetize enough to exist, without becoming just like Google.

  • Wobble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Also Mozilla: “You’re not ‘buying data’ as most people understand the term. You’re exchanging information for currency or other services.”