• cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 hours ago

    What would they use it for? The 2.5 seconds of latency would be too high for most uses. Cooling will be very difficult with no atmosphere. Solar power will be hard since night time lasts two weeks. Radiation will damage electronics unless they bury them.

    • Semperverus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      No hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, or other types of disasters on the moon. Asteroids are rare enough now that they basically don’t count.

      Latency is high but it doesnt matter for data redundancy.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Anything that needs a lot of data. Same reason you’d download something to your PC instead of streaming it.

      Also for local processing before upload. If you have a huge data set that compresses well, it’s much better to compress first, then upload to Earth.

  • shortwavesurfer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Seems like the moon would be close enough for our standard IPv6 TTLs to work, but it seems more likely that we will have to abandon domain names in favor of something like IPFS, since it’s a resource locator instead of a location locator. If you were on Mars, for example, you would not want to have to contact Earth every single time you wanted to load a web page. And so you would contact Earth the first time to load it. And then it would be saved locally. And so anybody who requested that page in the future would talk to you instead of Earth.

    • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Sounds like some sort of decentralized federation of server resources. I don’t know, seems a bit advanced. /s

      • shortwavesurfer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The problem isn’t the DNS requests. It’s the data synchronization that would have to occur if you were accessing a service hosted on Earth.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          It’s called caching and it’s been mostly solved for decades (except invalidation).

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Well I guess that’s what it takes to make Microsoft’s ocean bottom data center look reasonable. 😬