• dragonlobster@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    19 hours ago

    The theory is that on-prem includes a lot of ancillary costs like a team of staff for maintenance (or cost for outsourcing it), hardware maintenance/upgrades, cybersecurity, dealing with failures, backup, load balancing, multi-region/multizone etc.

    I don’t think cloud solves all these issues necessarily and I am convinced if you do the calculations cloud ends up being more expensive depending on the scale. I think you really pay the premium for convenience, speed (of getting things going) and user experience (the software)

    • Tower@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The biggest reason I think is SLAs and the ability to blame someone else when something goes wrong. I’ve seen it play out at multiple different companies now.

      • psmgx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        SLA and support is the biggest one. We had to pay Migrants for Docker Enterprise licenses just in case we needed support or some sort of liability shield.

      • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Yeah, having to have someone „on site“ who knows about cyber security and such vs having a piece of paper laying around that tells you that availability, continuity, security are hidden away in a SEP field. It’s easy to guess which one you want to choose…

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Depends whether you want to try preventing damage, or just have someone maybe* half-ass it and take the blame.

          *Like they say in security, “how do you know?”.