Cross posted from Discuit

    • LandedGentry
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Of course it’s plausible. The point is that it’s most likely not true.

      Plausibility is incredibly useful way to introduce falsehood.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I don’t understand why so many people are eager to (metaphorically) scream “FAKE!!!” at every story (that isn’t highly unlikely) told on the internet. Sure, maybe, but does it even matter? Odds are good something like this did happen somewhere.

        • LandedGentry
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          44 minutes ago

          odds are good something like this did happen somewhere

          I heard very similar responses when conservatives were shown that Haitians were not eating dogs in Ohio.

      • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        So, basically we know it’s a falsehood because it’s plausible. Saying something plausible is precisely what a liar would do!

        • LandedGentry
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          That is not even remotely what I said and you know it

            • LandedGentry
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Despite your stance/tone I’ll answer this in good faith and assume you’re genuinely asking even if I think you’re not.

              The best lies/misinformation attempts are couched in 1) truths and/or 2) plausible things that can’t be dismissed as impossible.

              It is plausible [insert any JFK assassination conspiracy]. Should they all be equally weighted? Is each equally plausible? No, yet dozens persist because they’re at all plausible. I say this as someone who says the least plausible scenario was lone gunman who was killed by some rando. I think it was a conspiracy. But it doesn’t mean I treat each conspiracy theory as equally plausible. Unfortunately it’s hard to 100% disprove basically anything, so even the worst ideas remain sticky if people want them to be true.

              • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Thanks ❤️

                In any case, all this is very little proof that the story is a falsehood. Obviously, by default everything you read online falls to the category “this may have happened”, but that’s all we really have.

                • LandedGentry
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 hours ago

                  The burden of proof squarely lies with OP. You didn’t ask me to prove it’s false. You asked me to explain my previous comment.

                  • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 hours ago

                    Yup, because the burden of proof is on the one who made the claim. But that only allows us to say the text is not necessarily true.

                    When you say the op is lying, that’s a new claim, where the burden of proof is on you.