Andrew Cuomo and Bill Clinton both have a lengthy list of sexual misconduct allegations against them. But as long as they’re politically useful, top Democrats don’t seem to care.

  • MagicShel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Or look at Al Franken who got pushed out over nothing. Your examples are cherry picked. Plus, wasn’t Cuomo forced out?

    • grumps@lemmy.i.secretponi.es
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yeah, it seems like there’s one party actually holding greater than 60% of their bad actors accountable and another one rewarding bad behavior… But, sure, let’s complain about how 60% is not enough instead of dealing with the reality we find ourselves in.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yes, Cuomo was forced out, but he is attempting a comeback by running for Mayor of NYC against Eric Adams. Aren’t there any non-shitty Democrats in the city who want that job?

      • formulaBonk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        If someone wants to be a politician that’s a disqualifying factor to being a politician. So yes he’s a fucking shitbag. People who want to improve our lives would rather do anything than politics because that’s just theatre for self absorbed sociopaths

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          20 hours ago

          it’s also theater some of us have to start doing. not me though. i’m far too corruptible and my soul too tainted already. i’d turn into one of the shitbags, i’m sure

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Al Franken was pushed out overbeing a popular progressive who could have easily won a presidential election.

      Cuomo was protected till the last possible second, to the point his brother had to resign from CNN over it if I’m not mistaken.

      If you’re trying to argue the party hasn’t protected abusive men for the last 30 years…

      Buddy, I know a guy that’s got some oceanfront property out in Arizona you may be interested in

      • MagicShel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Bro, I’m an OG Clinton hater. I didn’t say it didn’t happen, I said they are cherry picked examples.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          didn’t say it didn’t happen, I said they are cherry picked examples

          You seemed to be trying to have an argument with the author, and I feel it’s a reasonable assumption they won’t see your comment…

          But that’s kind of the point, the two examples is a neoliberal who faced zero consequences while president, and a progressive who literally didn’t lay a finger on anyone, and it was years before he was in office.

          The point is all the abusive men they’re still protecting.

  • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Can we please stop eating our own while the goddamn house is on fire? We’re gonna need them for the bucket brigade.

    • step 1 put out the fire
    • step 2 eat the mfers who set the house ablaze
    • step 3 eat the rich
    • step 4 tend to our own dirty laundry
    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Why do you assume all Democrats are trying to put out the fire? Schumer and 10 Senate Democrats just sold out the rest of the party and handed Trump a huge victory. We need to look at every single Democrat and make sure their buckets are full of water instead of gasoline before we decide to work with them.

      • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Well for one, I think Schumer made a mistake here and if I lived in NY I’d be calling him up to tell him just that.

        But I can see his logic as to why he went the way he did. He fears a govt shutdown is only going to let the foxes eat more of the henhouse.

        I think the public would have forgave the dems and I think a shutdown would have helped raise things to the fever pitch needed to suck all of the oxygen out of the room up there. Time will tell I guess.

        If you want to make sure they’re carrying water, then we gotta be the reservoir. You gotta add your drop to the bucket and I gotta add mine. That starts by calling, funding the causes you believe in, and then getting out in the streets and being real loud.

        • pjwestin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Even if what you’re saying about Schumer is true, it would still be gross incompetence to achieve this goal in the manner that he did. Even if you believe his whole, “Musk wants a shutdown,” argument, he allowed every single House Democrat, even those in vulnerable seats, to put themselves in a vulnerable position by refusing to fund the government, then threw them all under the bus by saying, “actually, funding the government is just too important.” Why would he damage his own party like that?

          Let’s be real here; the stock market has been tanking all week because of the tariffs, it would have gotten even worse with a shutdown, and Schumer takes a shitload of money from Wall Street. The day before the vote, his donors started telling him how important they think funding the government is, he caves, and the stock market makes a decent comeback the next day. He sold out his party to the donors, and gave Trump a huge win in the process.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Your mistake in this is thinking the Democrats are “your own”. You need to clean house before you can take on outside enemies.

      • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        This is precisely the same line of thinking that helped get the fire elected to the White House.

        It’s death by a thousand cuts.

        Not everyone who doesn’t align with you 100% is your enemy.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          18 hours ago

          But someone who only aligns with you 20% is not your friend.

          This is precisely the same line of thinking that helped get the fire elected to the White House.

          This isn’t a “line of thinking”; it’s just how things are. The Democrats are not your friends, they will not defend you and you can’t count on them. If that sounds like the reason Trump won, then great, because that literally is the reason Trump won and if you want to avoid a repeat of 2024 you’ll have to do something other than repeat 2024. Abusive relationship logic doesn’t get voters.

    • oakey66@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Lol. When you put Bill Clinton, Andrew Cuomo and every other horrendous caricature of evil in the democratic party as “our own”, you’ve doomed yourself to losing in perpetuity.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    "Registered Democrats were given a list of 11 Democrats who either have announced they are running for New York City mayor or are seen as a possible mayoral candidate. They were asked if the Democratic primary for mayor were being held today, for whom would they vote. Andrew Cuomo receives 31 percent support; Eric Adams receives 11 percent support; Zohran Mamdani receives 8 percent support; Jumaane Williams receives 7 percent support; Scott Stringer receives 6 percent support; Brad Lander receives 5 percent support; Jessica Ramos and Adrienne Adams each receive 4 percent support; and Zellnor Myrie, Michael Blake, and Whitney Tilson each receive 1 percent support. "

    I’m not a New Yorker, but of that entire list I only recognize the names of Cuomo and Adams, and for both their misconduct. So this could be a situation of simple name recognition especially since only 31% said Cuomo.

    Also on election day for the Presidency in 2024 we had this news:

    “Google searches for Biden’s candidacy surged on Election Day: Though Google has not released the exact number of queries, the trend spiking on Election Day highlights a disconnect for some Americans in the lead-up to the election. Many supporters were left confused, with searches peaking in Pennsylvania’s urban centers and spreading state by state as the day continued.” source

    The quote about Biden’s candidacy and at least a portion of the Cuomo answer to me sound simply like low information voters. So I don’t see the poll results showings Cuomo’s lead (again at only 31%) as the electorate forgiving him for his past transgressions, but more likely they don’t even know about them and perhaps just want a known alternative to Adams.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Like many people of a certain age, I feel like I owe Monica Lewinsky an apology.

    • CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Me too. I said truly awful things about her when she was so young and he was one of the world’s most powerful men

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Yeah. I’m not a realist by any means — if anything, I’m a constructivist and I think we can do better — but power exists. It may make me vomit in my own mouth and want to become a realist and sock someone but we can do better.

    It’s like that Jesus guy said: washing hoes feet will get you to Heaven. (I don’t think he said those exact words but you know Mary Magdalene’s feet were clean and smelling fresh. Anointed with fragrances and oils and everything. Jesus loved feet.)

  • xenomor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Of course they will. The Democratic Party’s only bedrock ideological stance is preserving neoliberal capitalism. All of their other supposed policy positions are merely fundraising slogans. If you feel compelled to downvote this comment because you rightfully want to mount an opposition to the fascist Republicans, please consider how ineffective Democrats have been in that effort for 40 years and start reforming the party. If you need help, it starts with actual standards and policies.