• Oldseeker6062@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    This could be good, but as a EV owner I am not convinced that I need a recharging speed that is this fast. I own a Chevy Bolt ( known for its sloooow charging speed) and even when we travel longer distances and need to charge stopping for 20 minutes would be great ( thats a bathroom break and snacks) so I applaud the technology but I think pushing the envelope down this far is not what most people would need.

    • porcupine@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Renters exist, and many of them don’t have the option to install charging infrastructure in their homes everywhere and every time they move. Their options today are:

      • don’t buy an EV
      • only rent housing that’s compatible with their vehicle
      • plan their day around publicly accessible charging station availability

      Faster charging lets people get in and out of charging stations faster, which lets more people charge, which makes EVs a more practical option for people other than single family homeowners with garages

      • Pili@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I think fast charging negatively impact battery life because of the heat it produces. It would be nice to be able to choose the amperage we want for a specific charge, when we’re not in a hurry.

        • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Which is why i still think that the best solution at the moment is still battery swapping stations. That way you get the best of both worlds. Your vehicle is back at full charge within a couple of minutes (the only limitation is how fast the mechanical operations can be performed), and the batteries themselves can be charged as slowly as needed to preserve long term battery life.

        • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          21 hours ago

          i mean the engineers developing this must be taking that into account, we don’t have to be worrying about this.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I would imagine they’ve considered batter degradation here. It could be that the approach they use doesn’t cause significant damage to the battery.

          • Awillia91@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            15 hours ago

            They actually tell you it’s better to charge it with the slow charger most of the time. The fast charger does have a negative effect on battery life. I don’t know how significant it is though.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              14 hours ago

              It’d be interesting to see what the difference is there. The ideal would be if you have a charger capable of rapid charging, and you can dial it down if you want to assuming there is a negative effect on the battery.