• Gabu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because? Things don’t become truthful just because you said them.

      • Gabu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Right… let’s check his comment point by point, shall we?

        A person does not need to eat meat.

        I believe you’ll agree with this without the need to further explain it.

        People absolutely do need to eat meat

        This is strictly true, in our current context. The food production chain simply cannot cope with the abrupt loss of a main source of nutrients in most places. Particularly when 'muricans are throwing away up to half of their food.

        specifically cooked meat in order to be intelligent.

        Non-statement statement of dubious quality. Should be rewritten.

        It’s what made cavemen smarter than other animals.

        That’s invariably the most accepted explanation to homo sapiens evolution

        Also the recent rise in average height and IQ from good nutrition is in part directly related to cheap meat from factory farming.

        Meat provides very dense nutritional value, I’m sure you’ll agree - it’s why carnivores exist to begin with. We know, factually, that nutritional quality directly correlates with better health, both in body and mind. We also know that meat can be VERY cheap, as long as you’re not looking for “grade A elite baby wagyuu” stuff.

        Where, exactly, is your point explicit?

        • masquenox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s invariably the most accepted explanation to homo sapiens evolution

          Oh really? Accepted by whom?

          • Gabu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The fucking scientific community? Let me be direct - Are you seriously going to ask ridiculous questions a 5 year old could answer instead of providing any argument whatsoever? Because at that point, I’d rather not waste my time with a functionally illiterate individual.

            • masquenox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The fucking scientific community?

              Then you should have zero problem providing proper back-up to your claims, shouldn’t you?